^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

The measure also states that Proposition 98 funds allocated to schools “shall first be expended . . .to pay the costs for state mandates incurred during that year.” Provisions Related to Budget Process Current Law Background.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050098.pdf

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

The measure also state that Proposition 98 funds allocated to schools “shall first be expended . . .to pay the costs for state mandates incurred during that year.” Provisions Related to Budget Process Current Law Background.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050099.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Live Within Our Means Act (version 5)

The measure also states that Proposition  98 funds allocated to schools “shall first be expended . . .to pay the costs for state mandates incurred during that year.” Provisions Related to Budget Process Current Law Background.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050100.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Live Within Our Means Act (version 6)

The measure also states that Proposition  98 funds allocated to schools “shall first be expended . . .to pay the costs for state mandates incurred during that year.” Provisions Related to Budget Process Current Law Background.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050101.htm

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Bill Lockyer 3 March 2, 2005 Proposition 98 funds allocated to schools “shall first be expended . . .to pay the costs for state mandates incurred during that year.” Provisions Related to Budget Process Current Law Background.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050101.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Economic Recovery Tax Relief Act (version 3)

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Economic Recovery Tax Relief Act (version 3) February 25, 2005 Dear Attorney General Lockyer: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the statutory initiative relating to state taxation (File No.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050102.htm

^[PDF] State Taxation

The measure includes intent language to neither increase nor decrease funding for schools governed by Proposition 98. FISCAL EFFECTS OF THE INITIATIVE Revenue Impacts The measure would increase revenues as a result of changes to the insurance tax, CT, and PIT, and by imposing a new oil severance tax.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050102.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The Economic Recovery Tax Relief Act (version 2)

The California Constitution specifies that property taxes shall be collected by counties and allocated to local agencies (cities, counties, special districts, and K-14 school and community college districts) within the counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050103.htm

^[PDF] (1) various changes in the state's existing corporation tax (CT), personal income tax (PIT), insurance gross premiums tax, and local property tax, and (2) the imposition of a oil severance tax

Local property tax revenues allocated to school districts and community colleges count toward the Proposition 98 minimum Preprinted Logo will go here Hon. Bill Lockyer 2 February 25, 2005 funding guarantee.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050103.pdf

^[PDF] Political Contributions from Corporations

Bill Lockyer 2 February 25, 2005 • Fiscal Summary. This measure would have the following major fiscal impact: State enforcement costs potentially totaling a few hundred thousand dollars annually, partially offset by increased fine revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050104.pdf