^[PDF] Marriage Equality (version 3)

Particularly in the near term, this could increase revenues to state and local governments (primarily sales tax revenues). Over Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. 2 October 30, 2009 the longer run, however, this measure would likely have little fiscal impact on state and local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090611.pdf

^[PDF] California Education Tax Relief Act

Local Property Tax. The California Constitution authorizes local governments to levy property taxes. These revenues are split among cities, counties, school districts, and community college districts, with distribution among the various entities varying by county.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090630.pdf

^[PDF] The Fair Insurance Premiums and Practices Act

Insurance Premium Tax. Under current law, insurance companies doing business in California pay an insurance premium tax in lieu of a state corporate income tax. The tax is based on the amount of insurance premiums they earned in the state each year for various types of insurance coverage.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090640.pdf

^[PDF] California Taxpayer Protection Act of 2010 (version 4)

These savings would be partially offset by increased state and county costs for children who shifted into state- and county-supported Foster Care or into county-run general assistance programs. The provisions changing the processes for applying for public benefits could also reduce state and local costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090653.pdf

^[PDF] Parental Notification, Child and Teen Safety, and Stop Predators Act (version 4)

Under these circumstances, there could also be a minor increase in child welfare and foster care costs for the state and counties. Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. 6 November 25, 2009 Summary of Fiscal Effects This measure would have the following fiscal effect:  Potential unknown net state costs of several million dollars annually for health and social services programs, court administration, and state health agency administration combined.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090665.pdf

^[PDF] Local Control of Local Classrooms Funding Act

FISCAL EFFECTS Increases in Local Tax Revenues for Education. Because it reduces the existing vote threshold for adopting a parcel tax, the measure would likely increase the approval rate of parcel tax measures and result in more local tax revenues for K-12 schools and com- munity colleges.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090692.pdf

^[PDF] Community Funding Protection and Accountability Act of 2010 (Amendment #1-S)

Majority Approval of Sales Tax Measures Under the measure, a majority of county voters could impose a higher local sales tax rate of up to one cent, based on a county-approved “countywide strategic action plan” as defined by the measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090708.pdf

^[PDF] State Parks and Wildlife Conservation Trust Fund Act

Brown Jr. 2 December 11, 2009 primarily distributed to cities and counties. Revenues from the VLF are also used for grants to law enforcement organizations and some revenues are deposited in the state’s General Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090715.pdf

^[PDF] New Public Employees Benefits Reform Act (version 1)

In addition, state and local governing bodies (such as the Legislature, county boards of supervisors, and city councils)—not public retirement systems— would determine the manner and number of years over which any future unfunded li- abilities related to new employees would be paid off.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090725.pdf

^[PDF] Protect Homeowners and Close Corporate Tax Loopholes Act

County Administration Costs. From the higher tax revenues generated by the new assessment policy, counties would deduct a “reasonable” amount for the higher costs of assessing the specified commercial properties based on market value.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090727.pdf