2005 Initiative Analysis:Taxpayer Protection Act of 2006

The measure would invalidate charges established after January 1, 2006 that do not meet the more stringent definitions imposed by the measure unless they are reenacted within one year of the effective date of the measure with a two-thirds vote.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050596.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis:California Marriage Protection Act

Couples of the same sex or unmarried couples of the opposite sex where at least one partner is 62 years or older may register as domestic partners. In most instances, registered domestic partners are provided the same rights and benefits as married couples.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050628.htm

^[PDF] California Marriage Protection Act

Couples of the same sex or unmarried couples of the opposite sex where at least one partner is 62 years or older may register as domestic partners. In most instances, registered domestic partners are provided the same rights and benefits as married couples.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050628.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis:California Marriage Protection Act (version 2)

Couples of the same sex or unmarried couples of the opposite sex where at least one partner is 62 years or older may register as domestic partners. In most instances, registered domestic partners are provided the same rights and benefits as married couples.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050629.htm

^[PDF] Corporate Political Accountability Act

Specifically, the measure requires stockholders to approve the total amount of political contributions for the subsequent fiscal year. For increased expenditures within a fiscal year, stockholders would be required to approve specific contributions to entities.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050638.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis:Wealth Tax. (Amendment #1-S.)

The wealth tax would be based on the tax rates established by the federal estate tax, which in calendar year 2006 are scheduled to range from 18  percent to 46  percent. It appears that the wealth tax would be levied on taxpayers in the state on a one-time basis, with revenues to be received in 2007 ‑08 and 2008 ‑09.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050639.htm

^[PDF] Evans Child Protection Act

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation estimates that the measure would result in increasing annual operating costs which would reach about $550 million from the General Fund by 2024-25, increasing to about $1.5 billion by mid-century, when its full effect would be realized.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050655.pdf

^[PDF] Preschool for All Act

Once the SPI has approved their plans, COEs would receive PFA monies to fund qualified program providers including COEs, school districts, public higher education institutions, charter schools, and both non- and for-profit providers.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050658.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law

Current law bars anyone convicted of specified sex offenses against a child from residing within one-quarter mile of an elementary or middle school while on parole. This measure would broaden this prohibition to bar any person required to register as a sex offender from living within 2,000 feet (about four-tenths of a mile) of any school or park.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050731.htm

^[PDF] Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica’s Law

Current law bars anyone convicted of specified sex offenses against a child from residing within one-quarter mile of an elementary or middle school while on parole. This measure would broaden this prohibition to bar any person required to register as a sex offender from living within 2,000 feet (about four-tenths of a mile) of any school or park.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050731.pdf