Cal Facts: California's Economy and Budget in Perspective-2002 [Publication Details]

Dec 2, 2002 - These "snapshots" of information provide a broad overview of public finance and program trends in the state. Reports by Policy Area
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/914

^[PDF] The Bring Manufacturing Jobs Back to California Act

Proposal This measure requires, effective January 1, 2014, state and local government entities to purchase goods and materials manufactured in the United States “substantially all from materials produced in the United States.”
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110564.pdf

2011 Initiative Analysis:The Bring Manufacturing Jobs Back to California Act

Lastly, in response to the measure, additional suppliers could enter the domestic market to meet state and local government demand for goods produced in the United States. Each of these responses —Legislative exemptions, a flexible interpretation of the United States manufacturing standard and exemptions under trade agreements, and an increase in
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110564.aspx

2012 Initiative Analysis: College and University Funding and Accountability Act

Depending on whether the new state tax revenues are sufficient to satisfy increased state spending requirements on public universities and colleges, unknown effects on other parts of the state budget and the state General Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2012/120545.aspx

^[PDF] Sports wagering.

State law limits the type of gaming that can occur in California. For example, state law currently bans sports wagering in California. However, state law allows certain gaming activities in the state.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2023/230549.pdf

^[PDF] The Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014

The state began to pay down its existing school deferrals in 2012-13, when state revenues increased significantly. For example, the state eliminated the February-to-July deferral and returned the payment to its original schedule, incurring $2 billion in one-time costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130575.pdf

^[PDF] Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014-Version 3

The state began to pay down its existing school deferrals in 2012-13, when state revenues increased significantly. For example, the state eliminated the February-to-July deferral and returned the payment to its original schedule, incurring $2 billion in one-time costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130657.pdf

^[PDF] InitiativAmend the Constitution to allow and facilitate future, but unknown, legislative actions that could substantially increase state healthcare spending and associated tax revenues.e Letter

Constitution Limits State and Local Government Spending; State Nearing Its Spending Limit. Proposition 4 (1979) amended the State Constitution to impose spending limits (technically, appropriations limits) on the state and most local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2017/170547.pdf

^[PDF] Gaming.

The measure could result in various other fiscal impacts on the state and local governments. For example, the state and local governments could experience increased revenues from economic activity generated from people from out of state visiting to place sports wagers and spending more in the state as a result.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2023/230548.pdf

^[PDF] College and University Funding and Accountability Act

State Financial Aid Programs. In the short term, it is unclear what effect the initiative’s minimum spending requirement would have on financial aid programs. Since the state recently reduced state spending on the Cal Grant program by substituting federal funds, the state could be required to increase state spending significantly to meet the minimum state spending requirements.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2012/120545.pdf