^[PDF] Focus Budget 1992 Local Government Funding

Transfer of Special Funds Each fiscal year there are amounts transferred from special funds to the General Fund to finance certain state activities. For 1992-93, however, there were several additional transfers in recognition of the need to address the General Fund revenue shortfall.
https://lao.ca.gov/1992/090892_focus_budget.pdf

^[PDF] The 1991-92 State and Local Program Realignment

Under the legislation, counties may: • Transfer up to 10 percent of funding from the health or mental health accounts that could be used to offset entitle- ment caseload costs. • Ifnecessary, transfer sales tax revenue growth allocated to other programs to fund caseload costs. • If necessary, transfer up to an additional 10 percent of funding
https://lao.ca.gov/1992/reports/91-92_state_local_program_realignment_541_0292.pdf

^[PDF] Benefits of Proposed Program Transfer. The

Benefits of Proposed Program Transfer. The primary benefit of the proposed transfer is that it would encourage counties to be more cognizant of program linkages with criminal justice and social services programs and, therefore, to take more direct responsibility for ensuring the effectiveness of substance abuse programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/Mgms_157_0593.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the May Revision 1993-94

City governments and redevelopment agencies would be required to transfer about $288 million and $65 million, respectively, to support schools. The Administration indicates that “the state should repeal all mandates on local programs not directly related to public safety,” in order to give local governments the flexibility to give carryover deficit account for
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/Overview_May_Revision_176_0593.pdf

^[PDF] California Update: 1993-94 Budget Enacted

Special fund reductions and transfers provide $545 million to close the Gen- eral Fund gap. Significant savings also resulted from reductions to SSI/SSP grants to the disabled and elderly ($151 million) and from higher educa- tion reductions ($237 million). • IncreasedResources-$825Million.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/reports/cal_update_0793.pdf

^[PDF] Local Government Property Tax Transfers

Cities and counties also have authority to institute a variety of taxes, including utility users', business license, property transfer, and transient occupancy taxes. These taxes raised a total of $2.4 billion in general purpose revenue for California's cities and counties in 1990-91.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/reports/local_gov_prop_tax_transfer_151_0293.pdf

^[PDF] Performance Budgeting: Reshaping The State’s Budget Process

The City of Los Angeles implemented a version of it in the early 1950s. Recently, however, there has been re- newed interest in this budgeting approach at the state and fed- eral levels. For example, the National Conference of State Legislatures identifies 23 states that are involved to some de- gree with performance budget- ing.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/reports/mgwb_performance_budgeting_183_1093.pdf

^[PDF] Trial Court Funding

In recent years, the state's support of the Trial Court Funding Program has become increasingly dependent on revenues transferred to the state from local governments, which, in turn, have been redistributed back to counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/reports/trial_court_funding_0393_reprint.pdf

MAJOR FEATURES OF THE 1994 CALIFORNIA BUDGET

It also provides $9 million, mostly from the California Water Fund, to the City of Los Angeles for a waste water reclamation project to replace water previously diverted from Mono Lake. To provide funds for this project, the budget reduced support for the Department of Water Resources by about $2.4 million compared to the level proposed in January.
https://lao.ca.gov/1994/94budget.html

^[PDF] Bonds and the 1994 Ballots

About $7.4 billion of the bonds are for projects that would be developed by entities other than the state, such as cities, school districts, and water authorities. policy choices, the Legislature would have to weigh the implications of the programmatic changes with the benefits of reducing future infrastructure needs.
https://lao.ca.gov/1994/Bonds_and_1994_Ballots.pdf