LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: California Department of Food and Agriculture (8570)

We recommend the Legislature reject this request, due to the av ailability of carryover funds from the current-year budget. (Reduce Item 8570-001-0001 by $174,000.) Hydrogen Highway Funding. Existing law requires CDFA to adopt specifications for gasoline and other specified fuels for use in motor vehicles.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/general_govt/gen_17_8570_anl06.html

^[PDF] The 1990-91 Budget: Perspectives and Issues

Martin Lenora Martinez ii Carol Perrin Maria Ponce Senita Robinson-Taylor Patricia Prosser Skott Kelly Zavas Contents PART ONE: ~TATEFISCAL PICTURE •.•••••••••••••••.••;;.••....••.•.••••••..•••.•••••,••••••••.••••••..•..••••••.•.•. 3 state Fiscal Picture 7 PART TWO: PERSPECTIVES ON THE 1990·91 BUDGET: EXPENDITU:RES •.••..•••••••. 17 Expenditures in 1990-91 , 21
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1990/pandi_90_intro.pdf

^[PDF] State Spending Plan for 1990-91: The 1990 Budget Act and Related Legislation

If imple- mented by PERS, this change could save the General Fund $31 million in 1990-91. • Authorizes PERS to adopt an amortization period of 40 years (rather than the current 27 years) for payment of the unfunded liability applicable to certain retirement categories.
https://lao.ca.gov/1990/reports/0890_state_spending_plan_for_1990-91.pdf

^[PDF] State Spending Plan for 1991-92: The 1991 Budget Act and Related Legislation

K-12 Education In 1991-92, funding for K-12 education from all sources—state, local, and federal—will total $27 billion, making it the single largest program in the state budget. This amount represents an increase of $1.6 billion, or 6.2 percent, over what was available in 1990-91.
https://lao.ca.gov/1991/0991_spending_plan_91.pdf

^[PDF] Updated 2001 General Fund Revenue Projections

Hill Legislative Analyst cc: Paul Navarro, Chief Consultant
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/010601_cox_revenue_letter.pdf

FEES AND FINANCIAL AID

General Fund Support of Higher Education Declining Since 1990-91 University of California. General Fund spending at the UC grew at an average annual rate of 4.1 percent from 1988-89 to 1990-91. Since 1990-91, the fiscal constraints imposed by the state's recession resul ted in an average annual reduction in General Fund spending of 3.8 percent (6.9 percent after adjusting for inflation).
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/010195_calguide/cghied2.html

^[PDF] The 1989-90 Budget: Perspectives and Issues

The budget proposes to repeal 27 state mandates, ranging from funding absentee ballot costs to filing missing' persons reports. • In-Home Supportive Services (-$64 million). LimIts on provider reimbursement rates and th~ number of hours of service Pl'ovided are expected to freeie state costs atthe current-year leve!.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1989/pandi_89_part1.pdf

LAO Publications

LAO Publications February 21, 1990 - A Series of Drug-Related Pieces: Drug Use in California, Anti-Drug Programs in California, Drug Prevention Programs Report Analysis of the 1990-91 Budget Bill Format: February 1, 1990 - Analysis of the 1990-91 Budget Bill Report The 1990-91 Budget: Perspectives and Issues Format: PDF February 1, 1990 - (360
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications?page=305&year=0&productid=0&categoryid=0

^[PDF] An Overview of the 1990-91 Governor's Budget

An Overview of the 1990-91 Governor's Budget Policy Brief ~ periodic analyses of issues before the Legislature ~==================================::::=:::::::============================:d( LAO }= An Overview of the 1990-91 Governor's Budget In order to provide the Legislature with a perspective on the state's bUdget dilemma for 1990-91, we have prepared this brief overview.
https://lao.ca.gov/1990/reports/0290_overview_of_the_1990-91_governors%20budget.pdf

^[PDF] The 1990-91 Budget: Perspectives and Issues

The 1990-91 Budget: Perspectives and Issues 900 -IHSS 800 -CWS 700 600 500 400 -;------ 300 200 1 ---- 100 "" 81-82 82-83 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 . (est.) (prop.) estimated General Fund expenditures in the current year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1990/pandi_90_part2.pdf