^[PDF] Repeal SB48 V2

Repeal SB48 V2 Preprinted Logo will go here January 9, 2012
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110761.pdf

Initiative Analyses

File No. 2011-064 Government Employee Pension Reform Act of 2012 V2 (Amndt. #1S) This measure would amend the State Constitution to impose new requirements and limitations concerning public employee pension benefits and the funding of such benefits by employers and employees.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiatives?page=31

2011 Initiative Analysis:Repeal SB48 V2

2011 Initiative Analysis:Repeal SB48 V2 January 9, 2012   Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed initiative (A.G. File No. 11 ‑0085) that would change existing requirements regarding the inclusion of certain people and groups in school instruction.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110761.aspx

^[PDF] Save Our Secret Ballot in California Act

i lat1 " ,; f.na~ ~-:;i. v2':; L Jlree!. ·I)uitt: Hl4.ifl · .:i l !.'lil ul';;.i.lt.., C!~ ~~!!l ! (~' 1 6) a~ ·-4:<'~ b· r;\X "2'ii -!2~ 1 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 2 May 10,2011 Fiscal Summary. This measure would have the following fiscal effect: • Potential increased costs on state and local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110288.pdf

^[PDF] Overview on Poverty

Despite its fl aws, the poverty thresholds allow researchers and policy makers to examine trends over time using a consistent measure.  Substantial Changes Set for 2011. In September 2011, the Census Bureau will publish two sets of poverty data.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2011/Poverty_Overview_05_10_11.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis:Voters' Right to Protect Marriage.

For the receipt of federal benefits or for federal tax purposes, current federal l aw only recognizes marriage between a man and a woman. State Laws. The State Constitution currently does not define marriage.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050563.htm

2006 Initiative Analysis: The Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative

The fiscal effect o f the measure is unknown and would depend on future interpretation by the courts of what constitutes “rights, incidents, or employee benefits of marriage,” both under existing l aw and under the measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060436.htm

2006 Initiative Analysis: The Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 2)

The fiscal effect o f the measure is unknown and would depend on future interpretation by the courts of what constitutes “rights, incidents, or employee benefits of marriage,” both under existing l aw and under the measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060490.htm

2006 Initiative Analysis: The Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 3)

The fiscal effect o f the measure is unknown and would depend on future interpretation by the courts of what constitutes “rights, incidents, or employee benefits of marriage,” both under existing l aw and under the measure.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2006/060628.htm

2000 Budget Analysis: H&SS; Foster Care

Current l aw provides the same COLA for FFHs and GHs, but makes them "subject to the availability of funds." We recommend providing a COLA to FFH and GH providers because (1) there is no pol icy rationale for distinguishing these types of providers from FFAs, and (2) revenues are sufficient to provide the COLA.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/health_ss/hss_19_Foster_Care_anl00.htm