Results


157 results

Sort by date / relevance

Insurance regulation. [Ballot]

Nov 10, 2025 - The Insurance Commissioner would decide what home-hardening standards would need to be me t. An insurer could ask the Insurance Commissioner to waive this requirement if the insurer already covers a lot of homes in places with high wildfire risk.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-020

[PDF] Santa Barbara County Annual Training Seminar

LET ME BEG IN VHTH THE CHANGING NATUqE OF INTEREST GROUPS, II. THt FRAGMENTATION OF INTEREST GROUPS A, G~ovm- 1 IN THE Nur"1!3ER oF INTEREST GRo_uPs 1. lNTEREST GROUPS HAVE AL~}.YS BEEN AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE LEGI SLATIVE PROCESS, 2.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/santa_barbara_county_annual_training_seminar.pdf

Initiative Analyses

For the purposes of verification, the me asure also requires that all state and local governmental entities accept only documentation that is recognized by the federal government.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiatives?page=67

LAO Publications

In the near term, we project Me di-Cal spending to grow to $23.9 billion in 2019-20. Over the long term, we project General Fund spending in Medi-Cal to grow to up to around $28 billion. In addition to this report, you can find the main California's Fiscal Outlook report along with a collection of other fiscal outlook material on our fiscal outlook budget page .
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications?page=84&year=0&productid=0&categoryid=0

2003 Initiative Analysis: Limitation on Cruel Confinement of Pigs

The me asure also allows pigs to be housed in this manner during the seven-day period prior to the expected date of giving birth. The measure would become effective on January 1, 2008. Fiscal Effect This measure would result in unknown, but probably minor, local and state criminal justice costs for enforcement and prosecution of individuals charged with the new pig confinement offense.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2003/030667.htm

[PDF] Underlying General Fund Expenditure 2007-08 to 2010-11

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me or Jason Sisney of my staff at 319-8361 ([email protected]).
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2010/bud/dutton_letter/100740_121010.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 2)

The fiscal effect of the me asure would depend on future interpretation by the courts of what constitutes “rights or incidents of marriage,” both under existing law and under the measure. For instance, the extension of health benefits to domestic partners of government employees has tended to be considered an employee benefit, rather than an incident of marriage.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050800.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: Voters' Right to Protect Marriage Initiative (version 2)

The fiscal effect of the me asure would depend on future interpretation by the courts of what constitutes “rights or incidents of marriage,” both under existing law and under the measure. For instance, the extension of health benefits to domestic partners of government employees has tended to be considered an employee benefit, rather than an incident of marriage.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050810.htm

Digital Elections Initiative

Proposal This measure would require the Secretary of State to establish a computer system that would allow any eligible voter to use a private computer or other device in an individual's ho me or office to sign any state or local petition, register to vote, and vote in all elections for public office within California through the use of electronically transmitted mess ages.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/1999/990842_INT.html

2007 Initiative Analysis: The Voters' Right to Protect Marriage

The me asure also prohibits government agencies from requiring private entities to extend the rights of marriage to unmarried persons. Fiscal Effect The measure would repeal some provisions of existing law and prohibit state and local government agencies from authorizing rights of marriage to domestic partners or other unmarr ied persons.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070435.htm