Publication Date

All

Current year

Past 5 years

 


 

Subject Area
Health (1)

Results


16 results

Sort by date / relevance

The MCO Tax: A Flat Versus Tiered Structure

Jul 20, 2015 - This is summarized in the following equation: Overall state funding = MCO net liability + federal reimbursement Therefore, to achieve $1.36 billion in total state funding, the Governor ’s proposal would leverage $700 million in federal funds ($1.36 billion minus $660 million in MCO liability) for the state ’s use, while a flat tax would leverage $410 million in federal funds ($1.36 billion minus $950 million in MCO liability).
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3292

[PDF] Various Employee Compensation and Retirement Agenda Items

For Item 9650-001-0001, the estimated General Fund contribution for these benefi ts is the Assembly amount plus $156.432 million, for a total of $1.36 billion.  Savings Able to Be Scored for 2009-10.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2010/Various_6_24_10.pdf

[PDF] Why Aren't Revenue Estimates More Accurate?

National Variables: Gra...th in n:al G'lP (;~) 4.4% 2.8% 1.6~f -0.2% -2.0% -0.6% Cor>surer price inflation (:t) 3.67; 3.6% 6.2% 10.4% 11.2"h 11.0% Civilian arplo;-11-ent (OCO) 85,500 (2.0%) R5,470 (1.9%) 85,200 (l.O",b) 86,4CO (2.4%) 86,200 (2.1%) 86,794 (2.0:<) Llnarplovr.ent rate (%) 5.0% 5.0% 5.9',£ 5.4% 5.5% 5.6% Private housing starts 2.03 ( -4.7%) 2.00 (-9.1%) l. 76 ( -15.6%) 1.70 ( -16.9%)
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/why_arent_%20revenue_estimates_more_accurate.pdf

[PDF] MCO Tax Overview

Revenue From Tiered Tax May Be Less Stable (Continued) 11L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E December 1, 2015 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE  An Example: Raising $1.36 Billion for the State’s Use  Governor’s January Proposal.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/health/2015/MCO-Tax-Overview-120115.pdf

[PDF] 1950 Budget Analysis: PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Fiscal Year positions Fiscal Year man-years Work load data (estimated) 1950-51 (estimated) recommended Formal matt~rs filed 335 5.68 368 5.58 Informal complaints filed ----------- 2,630 44.58 2,770 42.00 Special studies assigned ________ 80 1.36 . 130 1.97 Tariff sheets filed __ 17,975 304.66 20,000 303.00 Resolutions prepared and passed ______ 305 5.17 330 5.00 Letters written
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1950/24_puc_1950.pdf

[PDF] 1947 Budget Analysis: Department of Motor Vehicles

The following table shows the number of employees and licenses issued from the year 1940 through 1948: Table I-Division of Drivers' Licenses-Analysis of Drivers'Licenses Issued in Relation to Personnel of the Division Average Average number Number of number other NU1nber of units of licenses employees licenses Number of other Total issued per per Year issued examiners personnel employees examiner
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1947/31_dmv_1947.pdf

[PDF] 1970 Budget Analysis: Controller

._________1.31 1.56 1.48 Oakland _____________________________ 1.36 1.12 1.47 Santa Rosa __________________________ 1.22 .82 1.43 Sacramento __________________________ 1.13 1.15 1.62 San Diego __ .:.________________________ i.32 1.68 1.59 Fresno ____ ~ ____ :.____________________ .99 1.18 .95 Average in-state _:.____________________ $1.49 - $1.55 $1.96 Average out-of-state
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1970/10_fiscal_1970.pdf

[PDF] Energy Efficiency and Alternative Energy Programs

We note, however, that the most recent evaluation found that the programs only achieved an estimated benefit-cost ratio of 1.36. While this outcome is positive, it is a decline from prior years, which suggests that the state is now receiving diminishing returns on these particular energy efficiency investments.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/rsrc/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-121912.pdf

[PDF] Golden Handshake Legislation in 1993

\\:+ 1.34 1.345 1.35 1.355 1.36 1.365 1.37 1.375 1.38 1.385 1.39 1.395 lllilillllI111111111;1111[111.28 1.285 1.29 1.295 1.30 1.305 13.1 1.315 1.32 1.325 1.33 1.335 IWMWrnWI'MSfllW 1.22 1.225 1.23 1.235 1.24 1.245 1.25 1.255 1.26 1.265 1.27 1.275 .;:;~ ~~: ~:~: ~:;:: ~:;: ;::: ~:~: ~:;: ~:~~ ~:~: ~~~ ~:~~ Example: If you are age 55 and 1/2 when you retire, your retirement factor is 1.46 percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/1993/reports/golden_handshake_0893.pdf