Results


2,735 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] Taxpayer Protection Act of 2010

Governments may im- Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. 2 January 4, 2010 pose these charges for many reasons, including to offset their costs to provide specific services and benefits (“user fees”), regulate a particular activity (“regulatory fees”), pe- nalize certain behaviors (“fines” and “penalties”), and finance property or business im- provements (“assessments”).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090772.pdf

[PDF] A MANAGEMENT STUDY OF THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING

Page 4 - 2 4.2 Background The Information Management System (IMS) Section is organizationally assigned to the Information Technology and Support Management Division within the CCTC. The IMS Section is responsible for supporting all of the information technology (IT) needs of the Commission.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/02_2000_MGT_teacher_credentialing.pdf

[PDF] California Jobs Initiative

These include potential effects on the California economy and related im- pacts on state revenues, as well as effects on the administrative costs of state regulatory agencies. Potential Impacts on California Economy and Government Revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090794.pdf

[PDF] California Jobs Initiative (version 1)

These include potential effects on the California economy and related im- pacts on state revenues, as well as effects on the administrative costs of state regulatory agencies. Potential Impacts on California Economy and Government Revenues.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090851.pdf

[PDF] California Jobs Initiative (version 2)

During the suspension period, state agencies would be prohibited from pro- posing or adopting new regulations, or enforcing previously adopted regulations, im- plementing AB 32. Fiscal Effects Some Regulatory Activities Would Be Suspended.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090852.pdf

[PDF] Taxpayer Protection Act of 2010 (V-2)

Governments may im- Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. 2 January 15, 2010 pose these charges for many reasons, including to offset their costs to provide specific services and benefits (“user fees”), regulate a particular activity (“regulatory fees”), pe- nalize certain behaviors (“fines” and “penalties”), and finance property or business im- provements (“assessments”).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090808.pdf

[PDF] Microsoft Word - 090309.doc

Over the long run, this measure would likely have little fiscal im- pact on state and local governments. Sincerely, _____________________________ Mac Taylor Legislative Analyst _____________________________ Michael C.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090309.pdf

[PDF] Marriage Equality (version 3)

Over the long run, this measure would likely have little fiscal im- pact on state and local governments. Sincerely, _____________________________ Mac Taylor Legislative Analyst _____________________________ Michael C.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090611.pdf

[PDF] Marriage Equality (version 4)

Over the long run, this measure would likely have little fiscal im- pact on state and local governments. Sincerely, _____________________________ Mac Taylor Legislative Analyst _____________________________ Michael C.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090612.pdf

[PDF] California Marriage Equality Act (Amendment #1-S)

California Marriage Equality Act (Amendment #1-S) Preprinted Logo will go here March 5, 2009 Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090025.pdf