Proposed constitutional initiative related to gaming activities. [Ballot]

Aug 1, 2018 - Banking games generally involve players betting against the “house, ” who is a participant in the game with an interest in its outcome, and percentage games generally involve the house receiving a percentage of the money involved in the game.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2018-003

Gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Establishes State Regulation Over Sports Wagering. The measure provides CA DOJ and CGCC with some regulatory and oversight authority over sports wagering. The specific levels of authority that CA DOJ and CGCC would have over each t ribe would depend on the mechanism the tribe used to authorize sports wagering.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-030

Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - Establishes State Regulation Over Sports Wagering. The measure provides DOJ and CGCC with some regulatory and oversight authority over sports wagering. The specific levels of authority that DOJ and CGCC would have over each tribe w ould depend on the type of authorization the tribe received.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039

Sports wagering. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Since 1999, 80 out of over 100 federally recognized tribes in California have negotiated tribal-state compacts with the state or have been issued federal gaming regulations. (We note that not all of these tribes currently operate casinos.)
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-031

Online sports wagering. [Ballot]

Oct 20, 2021 - This tax is applied to the amount a person bets. Additionally, the measure authorizes DOSBC to take va rious enforcement actions, including requiring people making such bets to register with DOSBC, requiring entities illegally offering online sports wagering to disclose the names of people who make wagers with them, and blocking access to illegal sites accepting sports wagers.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-017

Immunology and immunotherapy. [Ballot]

Dec 17, 2025 - The net fiscal impact of the ind irect effects of the measure is unknown at this time. Summary of Fiscal Effects. We estimate that the measure would have the following major, direct fiscal effect: Increased state costs of about $500 million annually for 25 years to repay the bonds.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-026

Proposed Constitutional and Statutory Measure Related to Gaming [Ballot]

Jan 3, 2020 - This “minimum guarantee ” grows over time based on growth in state tax revenues, the economy, and student attendance. This year, the state General Fund will provide over $55  billion towards the minimum guarantee.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2019-029

California gaming activities. [Ballot]

Oct 1, 2021 - Banking games generally involve players betting against the “house, ” who is a participant in the game with an interest in the outcome, and percentage games generally involve the house receiving a percentage of money involved in the game.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-009

Child custody. Amendment #1. [Ballot]

Jun 2, 2016 - In addition, the measure could also potentially result in ind ividuals who otherwise would have reached agreement in an uncontested case now choosing to go to court. The costs of such jury trials could be partially offset by fees courts are currently authorized to charge when there is a jury.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2016-003

A proposed statutory initiative related to felony sentencing (Amendment #1). [Ballot]

Oct 2, 2015 - These costs could be several million dollars statewide over the first year following implementation of the measure. This measure could also result in a variety of other state and local government fiscal effects.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2015-048