^[PDF] Proposition 27: Allows Online and Mobile Sports Wagering Outside Tribal Lands. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

However, bets on certain other events (such as high school games and elections) would be banned. „ Allows the following groups to apply for a five-year license to offer online sports betting: — Tribes With Tribal-State Compacts.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/crimjust/2022/Prop-27-081022.pdf

Online sports wagering. [Ballot]

Oct 20, 2021 - This includes developing regulations and licensing requirements, authorizing the list of events and bet types eligible for online sports wagering, and investigating abnormal wa gering activity (such as the “fixing ” of games).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-017

Gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Tribes that choose to adopt the model compact agreement to govern in-person and/or online sports wagering would have the primary responsibility to regulate sports wagering. For exa mple, such tribes would be responsible for reviewing what games or bets can be offered and what rules would apply (such as how payouts for winning wagers are calculated).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-030

^[PDF] Online sports wagering.

This includes developing regulations and licensing requirements, authorizing the list of events and bet types eligible for online sports wagering, and investigating abnormal wagering activity (such as the “fixing” of games).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2021/210494.pdf

^[PDF] Authorizing Online Poker In California: Issues For Consideration

Although the existence of multiple legal poker websites could promote competition, having too many sites could result in each site not having suffi cient players to facilitate poker games. Issue: Who Could Offer Online Poker?
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/crimjust/2015/Authorizing-Online-Poker-California-Issues-Consideration062415.pdf

^[PDF] Authorization of Online Poker in California

This could make it more diffi cult for new California online Web sites to capture a share of the market in the near term. The state could allow simi- lar incentives for its games.  Games Offered. Legal poker Web sites would have to compete with existing illegal Web sites that have little or no limits on the types of games
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2010/Online_Poker_02_09_10.pdf

Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - Tribes that choose to adopt the model compact agreement to govern in-person and/or online sports wagering would have the primary responsibility to regulate sports wagering. For exa mple, such tribes would be responsible for reviewing what games or bets can be offered and what rules would apply (such as how payouts for winning wagers are calculated).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039

^[PDF] Authorizing Online Poker in California

Although the existence of multiple legal poker websites within California could promote competition, having too many sites could result in each site not having suffi cient players to facilitate poker games, as sometimes occurs on illegal websites.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2014/Authorizing-Online-Poker-in-California-042314.pdf

Sports wagering. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Key details of the bill and/or compacts that could significantly impact the magnitude of the fiscal effects include: the specific sports wagering activities which are authorized (such as whether both in-person and online sports wagering are permitted as well as the types of games that may be bet upon), the regulatory structure adopted, and the specific payments required.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-031

^[PDF] Proposition 26: Allows In-Person Roulette, Dice Games, Sports Wagering on Tribal Lands. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

However, betting would be banned on certain sports—such as high school games and games in which California college teams participate. — Requirements on Racetracks. Allows the state’s four privately operated racetracks to offer in-person sports betting to people 21 years of age and older.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/crimjust/2022/Proposition-26-081022.pdf