Publication Date

All

Current year

Past 5 years

 


 

Subject Area
Ballot (28)
See all

Results in Ballot from the past 5 years


28 results

Sort by date / relevance

High-quality public schools (Version 1). [Ballot]

Aug 30, 2023 - The measure defines high-quality publi c schools as “schools that equip [public school students] with the tools necessary to fully participate in our economy, our democracy, and our society. ” Fiscal Effects No Direct Fiscal Effect on the State or Schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-009

Proposition 13 [Ballot]

Mar 3, 2020 - Proposition 13 [Ballot] Grand Total $15.0 d a Of this amount, up to 10  percent would be reserved for school districts with 2,500 or fewer students. b Of this amount, $150  million would be reserved for testing and treating lead in water at schools. c Some of this amount could be used for facilities at Hastings College of the Law, which is affiliated with the University of California. d Up to 5  percent of bond funding may be used for administrative purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=13&year=2020

High-quality public schools (Version 2). [Ballot]

Aug 30, 2023 - This is because the measure does not require the state or local governing boards to make any specifi c changes to current policies or programs. The initiative could result in costs to the state and public schools, depending on how the measure is legally interpreted by the courts a nd implemented by the state and public schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-010

High-quality public education (Version 2). [Ballot]

May 16, 2023 - This is because the measure does not require the state or local governing boards to make any specifi c changes to current policies or programs. The initiative could result in costs to the state and public schools, depending on how the measure is legally interpreted by the courts a nd implemented by the state and public schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-002

High-quality public education (Version 3). [Ballot]

May 16, 2023 - This is because the measure does not require the state or local governing boards to make any specifi c changes to current policies or programs. The initiative could result in costs to the state and public schools, depending on how the measure is legally interpreted by the courts a nd implemented by the state and public schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-003

High-quality public education (Version 1). [Ballot]

May 16, 2023 - This is because the measure does not require the state or local governing boards to make any specifi c changes to current policies or programs. The initiative could result in costs to the state and public schools, depending on how the measure is legally interpreted by the courts a nd implemented by the state and public schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-001

Gasoline and Diesel Powered Vehicle Manufacturing Ban [Ballot]

Jan 14, 2020 - Pursuant to subsection (c) of Section 9005 of the Elections Code, we are informing you that, in our opinion, a reasonable estimate of the net fiscal impact of this proposed initiat ive measure cannot be prepared within 50 calendar days.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2019-031

Civil lawsuits. [Ballot]

Nov 29, 2021 - State law also authorizes cases generally seeking less than $10,000 to be filed in small claims c ourt in which attorney representation is prohibited. In contrast, attorney representation is permitted in civil cases filed outside of small claims court.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-029

Climate change. [Ballot]

Sep 1, 2023 - Over time, this could result in some lower costs for state health programs that support lower income residents, such as Medi-C al. The magnitude of such potential impacts are unknown. Summary of Fiscal Effects.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-012

Psilocybin legalization. [Ballot]

Jun 29, 2023 - We estimate that this measure would have the following major fiscal effects: Net reduction in costs, not likely to exceed a few million dollars annually, to state and local governments related to enforcing psilocybin-related offenses, handling the related c riminal cases and sealing of records in the court system, and incarcerating and supervising people convicted of psilocybin-related offences.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-004