Publication Date

All

Current year

Past 5 years

 


 

Subject Area
Ballot (6)
See all

Results in Ballot from the past 5 years


6 results

Sort by date / relevance

Proposition 36 [Ballot]

Nov 5, 2024 - By undoing parts of Proposition  47, Proposition  36 reduces the state savings from Proposition  47. This would reduce the amount the state must spend on mental health and drug treatment, school truancy and dropout prevention, and victim services.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=36&year=2024

Drug and theft crimes. [Ballot]

Oct 11, 2023 - Proposition  47.  In November 2014, voters approved Proposition  47, which reduced penalties for certain drug and theft-related crimes. For example, prior to Proposition  47, possession of illegal drugs for personal use and shoplifting (stealing property worth $950 or less from a commercial establishment) could be punished as felonies.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-017

Theft crimes. [Ballot]

Jan 12, 2022 - Because this measure would undo certain r eductions in punishment for petty theft and shoplifting enacted by Proposition  47, this measure would reduce the state savings attributable to Proposition  47.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-041

Oversight of certain public benefit artificial intelligence (AI) companies. [Ballot]

Jan 20, 2026 - The measure would have the following major fiscal effects: Increased state costs that would likely be in the tens of millions of dollars annually to establish and operate a new regulatory commission overseeing certain public benefit AI com panies.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-033

California labor law violations. [Ballot]

Nov 23, 2021 - On the other hand, trial courts could receive an increased number of appeals of Labor Com missioner decisions or an increased number of class-action lawsuits or other civil filings that otherwise would have been pursued as PAGA lawsuits.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-027

Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - This is because a federal court previously determined that the payments required by certain tribal-state com pacts into the state ’s General Fund for use at the state ’s discretion generally were an illegal tax prohibited under federal law.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039