State enforcement of the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [Ballot]

Dec 19, 2025 - Congress proposed the 22 nd Amendment in 1947 after the fourth presidential election of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Presidents elected since ratification of the 22 nd Amendment in 1951 have all served two or fewer terms.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-030

Online sports wagering. [Ballot]

Oct 20, 2021 - This tax is applied to the amount a person bets. Additionally, the measure authorizes DOSBC to take va rious enforcement actions, including requiring people making such bets to register with DOSBC, requiring entities illegally offering online sports wagering to disclose the names of people who make wagers with them, and blocking access to illegal sites accepting sports wagers.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-017

Gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Banking games generally involve players betting against the “house, ” who is a participant in the game with an interest in the outcome, and percentage games generally involve the house receiving a percentage of the money involved in the game.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-030

Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - For those under the state law framework, the measure authorizes CGCC to develop and implement various regulations —such as the types of bets that can be offered, licensing requirements, and consumer protection requirements.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039

Sports wagering. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - At minimum, these regulations must limit wagering to (1) bets made by people age of 21 and older; (2) professional or college sporting events that do not include animals other than horses; and (3) amateu r sporting events that do not include children under the age of 18.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-031

Immunology and immunotherapy. [Ballot]

Dec 17, 2025 - The net fiscal impact of the ind irect effects of the measure is unknown at this time. Summary of Fiscal Effects. We estimate that the measure would have the following major, direct fiscal effect: Increased state costs of about $500 million annually for 25 years to repay the bonds.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-026

California gaming activities. [Ballot]

Oct 1, 2021 - Banking games generally involve players betting against the “house, ” who is a participant in the game with an interest in the outcome, and percentage games generally involve the house receiving a percentage of money involved in the game.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-009

Insurer coverage of medical procedures and medication. [Ballot]

May 15, 2025 - (State and local governments currently spe nd tens of billions of dollars annually on Medi-Cal and employee and retiree health care.) Increased State Court Costs. The initiative would likely result in a net increase in state court workload and costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-002

High-quality public education (Version 2). [Ballot]

May 16, 2023 - The initiative could result in costs to the state and public schools, depending on how the measure is legally interpreted by the courts a nd implemented by the state and public schools. As such, these effects are unknown and highly uncertain.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-002

High-quality public education (Version 3). [Ballot]

May 16, 2023 - The initiative could result in costs to the state and public schools, depending on how the measure is legally interpreted by the courts a nd implemented by the state and public schools. As such, these effects are unknown and highly uncertain.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-003