The 2020-21 Spending Plan: Judiciary and Criminal Justice

Oct 22, 2020 - Excludes Proposal for Online Adjudication of Infractions. The Legislature rejected a January budget proposal to provide an $11.6  million General Fund augmentation in 2020 ‑21 (growing to $56  million in 2023 ‑24) to expand statewide the use of an online adjudication tool (including an ability to pay component) and backfill resulting reductions in criminal fine and fee revenue for the judicial branch.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4288

Drug interdiction program

May 29, 2013 - Subscribe | California State Legislature | Online Voter Registration | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Legislative Analyst's Office | The California Legislature's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor 925 L Street, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 445-4656
https://lao.ca.gov/Recommendations/Details/765

Statewide Minimum Wage Increasing in January

Dec 6, 2016 - Subscribe | California State Legislature | Online Voter Registration | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Legislative Analyst's Office | The California Legislature's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor 925 L Street, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 445-4656
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3512

LAO 2003 Budget Analysis: Capital Outlay, Department of Developmental Services (4300)

Porterville Projects Linked With Those of California Conservation Corps The Sequoia Base Center of the California Conservation Corps (CCC) is currently located on the Porterville grounds needed for the 96-bed expansion and the recreation and activity c enter.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2003/cap_outlay/co_11_4300_anl03.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: Two-Thirds Vote Preservation Act of 2005

As a result, fees not directly linked to the provision of a specif ic service or benefit would be classified as taxes and be subject to (1) a two-thirds vote requirement of the Legislature in the case of a state levy, or (2) a vote of the gover ning body and local electorate in the case of a local levy.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050177.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: Taxpayer Protection Act of 2006

As a result, fees not directly linked to the provision of a specif ic service or benefit would be classified as taxes and be subject to (1) a two-thirds vote requirement of the Legislature in the case of a state levy, or (2) a vote of the gover ning body and local electorate in the case of a local levy.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050540.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis:Taxpayer Protection Act of 2006

As a result, fees not directly linked to the provision of a specif ic service or benefit would be classified as taxes and be subject to (1) a two-thirds vote requirement of the Legislature in the case of a state levy, or (2) a vote of the gover ning body and local electorate in the case of a local levy.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050595.htm

^[PDF] Taxpayer Protection Act of 2006

As a result, fees not directly linked to the provision of a specific service or benefit would be classified as taxes and be subject to (1) a two- thirds vote requirement of the Legislature in the case of a state levy, or (2) a vote of the governing body and local electorate in the case of a local levy.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050595.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis:Taxpayer Protection Act of 2006

As a result, fees not directly linked to the provision of a specif ic service or benefit would be classified as taxes and be subject to (1) a two-thirds vote requirement of the Legislature in the case of a state levy, or (2) a vote of the gover ning body and local electorate in the case of a local levy.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050596.htm

2002 Budget Analysis: Judiciary and Criminal Justice, Board of Corrections (5430)

However, based upon our review of the study, this reduction in crime could not be directly linked to the CLEAR project. This is because there was a similar reduction in crime in comparison areas where the CLEAR project did not operate.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/crim_justice/cj_5_5430_anl02.htm