LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Employment Development Department (7100)t

This cost could be supported by the General Fund and the DI fund. Based on the amount of DI revenues collected, abo ut 30  percent of first-year costs could be allocated to the DI fund. Thus, General Fund costs would be about $2.6  million and DI costs would be about $1  million.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/general_govt/gen_14_7100.htm

^[PDF] LAO 2005-06 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services Chapter

In theory, private hospitals could receive the same level of payments overall that they now receive, but with all funding com- ing from the state General Fund. None of their support would henceforth come from DSH, and a much smaller portion, if any, would come from supplemental payments.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/health_ss/healthss_anl05.pdf

LAO 2006 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Major Expenditure Proposals In the 2006-07 Budget

K-14 Funding Is Linked to State’s Fortunes It is important for the Legislature to consider the significant increase in Proposition 98 spending proposed by the Governor in the context of the administration’s overall General Fund spending plan.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/2006_pandi/pi_05_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Intersegmental: Year-Round Operations at UC and CSU

The supplemental funding provided to UC and CSU in 2002-03 for summer operations was similarly linked to growth in summer enrollment. UC Summer Enrollment Has Increased Figure 2 compares summer 2000 and summer 2005 FTE enrollment at eight general UC campuses (excluding the new campus in Merced).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_21_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: California Community Colleges (6870)

Link Equalization Funding to New Apportionment Allocation Method Use Latest CCC Data to Measure Equalization. The Legislature chose the 90 th percentile as a reasonable point where disparities in revenues limits would be reduced to acceptable levels.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_25_6870_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Student Aid Commission (7980)

When the Cal Grant Entitlement program was created in 2000, this p olicy was replaced with a new provision linking the maximum private-student Cal Grant award to whatever amount was specified in the annual budget act.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_26_7980_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Office of Emergency Services (0690)

It also coordinates federal assistance for natural di saster grants. Since 2003-04, OES’s Law Enforcement and Victim Services (LEVS) division has administered criminal justice grant programs formerly managed by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/general_govt/gen_04_0690_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Medi-Cal (4260)

“Nominal” Copayment Limits Linked to Inflation. The nominal level at which copayment levels are set in federal law (generally $3 for most services) could be adjusted by the state each year for inflation.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/health_ss/hss_08_4260_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (5180)

Counties have the di scretion to move these block grant funds among program elements in order to address specific needs at the local level. Unspent single allocation funds eventually revert to the T ANF reserve, however, counties have up to nine months to file supplemental claims.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/health_ss/hss_13_5180_anl06.html

Highlights of the 2006-07 Analysis

We recommend that any funding for equalization be linked to legislation amending the cu rrent allocation formula which, if unchanged, would erode the state’s equalization efforts over time. ( Analysis, page E-257. ) Administration of Financial Aid Programs Could Be Improved The state has struggled with how to structure the administration of its financial aid programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/highlights/analysis_highlights_022206.html