^[PDF] Remarks to the Conference Committee on SB 123/AB 223

.~ rlu.t) Di '5lribu.ti•Jn J 1 .... r s i r • t h o u ·::. <1 n d -::. ) ------------------------------------------. ~ Exhibit F Assembly Senate ~ersus Versus Senate Gov' '=· Gov's Gov's Versus Budg~;~ t () ~. ::;.e rnb 1 y SAnate Budget Budgot Assembly . e land~.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1983/sb-123_and_ab-223.pdf

^[PDF] Public Assistance in California: Facts and Figures

rot a 1 ready di s- garded; limited to fpur rrnnths; not prov; ded again until 12 nnnths since last AFOC paynent.· * Identlcal to fElderal requirerent.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/09_public_assistance_in_california_facts_and_figures.pdf

^[PDF] Public Assistance in California: Facts and Figures

~~td Bl;no Di,aoloo qlaiOO!ia .9::/. .OS'!. !.Sit. 3.00/. I, 136,200 11.241 l.Cr/8 21.7~9 Alp1ne c~· .wl 1. .0&7. .57!. : .42'l. 1.200 3 I R PJfla.oor .SJ/. .oct. .SEt. 1.~~11, 20.3GO 154 7 I"" Butte 1 .Sir/. .
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/public_assistance_in_california_facts_and_figures.pdf

^[PDF] Review of State Waste to Energy Programs

Another $150,000 in loans was approved by CDFA but never di sbursed . The remaining $1 million was trnnsferred to the General Fund to help ba l ance the 1981-82 bud9et. Six of the 15 projects, totaling $351,000 in loans, will produce ener9y from agricultural wastes or residues.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/review_of_state_waste_to_energy_programs_2-84.pdf

^[PDF] The Governor's Budget for 1984-85

{PERSPECTI VES AND ISSUES , PAGE 131) LAST YEAR, I CALLED THIS COt~ti~1ITTEE' S ATTENTION TO THE DI SPAR ITY IN THE DEGREE TO ~IHICH DIRECT SPENDING THROUGH THE BUDGET AND "SPENDING" THROUGH THE TAX SYSTEM WE RE CONTROLLED .
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/the_governors_budget_for_1984-85.pdf

^[PDF] Unemployment and Disability Insurance

IT IS INCREASING AUT~~TION IN THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES UNDER THE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (UI), DISABILITY INSURANCE (DI), AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PROGRAMS, IN ADDITION, IT IS ESTABLISHING AUTOMATED MANAGEMENT I ~lFORMA TI ON SYSTEMS WITH THE AIM OF PPOVIDHIG IMPROVED PROGRAM INFORMATION IN THE JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT, Ul APPEALS, AND TAX COLLECTION PROGRAMS.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1984/unemployment_and_disability_insurance.pdf

^[PDF] A Report on the Child Care Reimbursement System

As can easily be seen, the link between cost and urban location is negligible. -31- Range of Daily Cost Per Child in 87 Urban and Rural Child Care Programs 1981-82 Urban Rural Less than $14.00 21.0% 29.6% (I2) (8) $14.01 to $16.00 26.7 25.9 (I6) (7) $16.01 to $18.00 25.0 7.4 (15) (2) Over $18.00 28.3 37.0 (I7) (IO) Totals 100.0% 100.0% (60) (27) Average Cost $16.89 $16.25 When we
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1986/08_86_a_report_on_the_child_care_reimbursement_system.pdf

^[PDF] Special Education in California: A Sunset Review

The department therefore recommends that the Legislature require state-funded preschool programs to reserve 10 percent of their subsidized enrollment "slots" for handicapped children who may not otherwise qualify for these programs on the basis of income, so that these children can be served in an integrated setting.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1986/465_1286_special_education_in_california_a_sunset_review.pdf

^[PDF] The Native American Indian Early Childhood Education Program: A Sunset Review

Legislative Analyst's Recommendations We recommend that SDE conduct a com- prehensive evaluation of the Native Ameri- can Indian Early Childhood Education pro- gram, focusing on (1) the effectiveness of the program in improving the educational achievement levels of program participants and (2) the need to establish in pre-kindergar- ten through grade 4, specified model projects in Native American Indian education which increase competence in reading and mathe- matics.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1987/447_0687_native_american_indian_early_childhood_ed_program_sunset_review.pdf

^[PDF] Report on the 1988-89 Tax Expenditure Budget: Overview and Selected Reviews

By com- parison, growth in the 1988-89direct expendi- ture budget is 7.3 percent for General Fund expenditures and 5 percent for total direct expenditures (that is, General Fund plus spe- Page 4 cial fund expenditures, excluding bond funds).
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1988/12_88_report_on_the_1988_89_tax_expenditure_budget.pdf