Results


4,428 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] 1954 Budget Analysis: General Administration

This com- mission was established by Chapter 376, Statutes of 1939, and is de- signed to furnish a means whereby representatives of the 48 states can meet and discuss and report upon problems of joint state interest and of state-federal relations.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1954/10_general_admin_1954.pdf

LAO 2004 Budget Analysis: Department of Aging

In general, this proposal would provide local governments greater ability to adjust programs to meet the needs of their com munities and experiment to determine which efforts improve program outcomes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/health_ss/hss_08_4170_anl04.htm

[PDF] Governor’s Compact With UC and CSU

Consistent with our comments about earlier compacts under prior administrations, we believe that a multiyear funding com- pact for higher education could negatively affect program perfor- mance and the state budget process. • A multiyear funding commitment would reduce the Legislature’s annual budgetary discretion, undermining its ability to respond to the state’s policy needs in
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2004/Higher_Education_Compact_060104.pdf

2002 Initiative Analysis: Jarvis-Simon Homeowners and Renters Tax Relief Act

The IOUs’ growing indebtedness led to credit downgrades, which com plicated their ability to buy electricity. To address this problem, Chapter  4x, Statutes of 2001 (AB 1x, Keeley), authorized the state Department of Water Resources to assume a limited-term responsibility for purchasing electricity in the wholesale market on behalf of the state’s three largest IOUs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2002/020869_INT.htm

[PDF] California's Options for Administering the Federal Family Education Loan Program

By com‑ parison, administration of the direct loan pro‑ gram is centralized—colleges work directly with the federal government and loans are funded directly from the U.S. Treasury. Colleges them‑ selves select which program to use, though they can participate in both programs as long as no student receives a loan from both programs for the same enrollment period.
https://lao.ca.gov/2006/ed_fund/edfund_012406.pdf

[PDF] 1949 Budget Analysis: DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROl

The amount of $14,346 appears to be necessary to com- plete sale of the bonds. We recommend approval of the amount of $14,346 as requested. DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROl For Support of the Department of California Highway Patrol from the Motor Vehicle Fund Item 153, pages 32 and 33 of the Budget Bill and pages 384 to 388, inclusive, of the Budget.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1949/11_highway_patrol_1949.pdf

[PDF] Overview of Recent Changes in the In-Home Supportive Services Program

Providers must com- plete four main steps to be enrolled as an IHSS provider. New providers must complete the process by November 1, 2009 and current providers have until June 30, 2010.  Step 1: Provider Enrollment Form.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2009/IHSS_Overview_10_28_09.pdf

2001 Budget Analysis: Resources Overview

For DWR, the budget proposes 22 percent less in expenditures for 2001-02, com pared to the estimated current-year level. The reduction includes a decrease of $254 million (mainly in local assistance) for various projects and programs funded with Proposition 13 bond funds.  
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/resources/res_1_overview.htm

[PDF] 1954 Budget Analysis: Transmittal

The recommendations contained in this report, while they are di- rected primarily at the proposed expenditures for the single Fiscal Year 1954-55, give consideration to the financial implications of the Budget for a full two-year period.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1954/01_transmittal_1954.pdf

[PDF] 1968 Budget Analysis: General Administration

T4e commission proper is com- posed of. 10 appointed members with. staff support provided by .4 professional and 2 clerical positions. The commission will conclude its work on the State Building Stand- ards Code by June 1968.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1968/05_general_admin_1968.pdf