^[PDF] Community Hospital Taxes. (Version 2)

Federal Funding Related Requirements The measure prohibits the imposition and collection of charges by the state on com- munity hospitals for the purpose of obtaining additional federal funds unless the fol- lowing federal matching requirements are met:  Required Federal Matching Level.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090724.pdf

^[PDF] Community Hospital Taxes. (Version 3)

Maintenance of Existing Funding for Hospital Services The measure prohibits the use of any funding from these types of charges on com- munity hospitals to replace existing funds for hospital services provided to Medi-Cal patients.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090729.pdf

^[PDF] Community Hospital Taxes (Version 7)

Federal Funding Related Requirements The measure prohibits the imposition and collection of charges by the state on com- munity hospitals for the purpose of obtaining additional federal funds unless the fol- lowing federal matching requirements are met:  Required Federal Matching Level.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090746.pdf

^[PDF] Government Spending Limit Act of 2010 [V-1]

This measure repeals the existing constitu- tional provisions that establish how excess state revenues (described above) will be di- vided between educational entities and tax rebates. Under this measure, excess state revenues (as defined by the spending limit provisions of the Constitution) generally would have to be spent for the “reduction of state debt.”
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090778.pdf

^[PDF] Taxes [V-1]

In some cases—such as many user fees, admission fees, and assessments—the charge is closely linked to the cost of providing a particular service to an individual beneficiary. In other cases—particularly regulatory fees (including environmental miti- gation)—the charge may be based on the costs of government oversight of a group or industry, or on the social costs associated with particular activities.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090780.pdf

^[PDF] Taxpayer Protection Act of 2010 (V-2)

In some cases—such as many user fees, admission fees, and assessments—the charge is closely linked to the cost of providing a particular service to an individual beneficiary. In other cases—particularly regulatory fees (including environmental miti- gation)—the charge may be based on the costs of government oversight of a group or industry, or on the social costs associated with particular activities.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090808.pdf

^[PDF] Taxes [V-3]

In some cases—such as many user fees, admission fees, and assessments—the charge is closely linked to the cost of providing a particular service to an individual beneficiary. In other cases, the charge may be based on the costs of government over- Hon.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090845.pdf

^[PDF] 21st Century Ballot Reform Act

These include links to recent campaign finance reports for proponents of an initiative measure, links to campaign Web sites, links to public hearings held on the subject, among others. Fiscal Effect No Significant Change in Ballot Preparation Costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/100052.pdf

^[PDF] California Public Divest From Israel Act

Pension systems also must di- versify their investments so as to minimize investment risks and maximize return. Ac- Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. 3 March 1, 2010 cordingly, the ability of the Legislature or the electorate (through the statutory initiative process) to restrict the system’s investments is limited.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/100067.pdf

^[PDF] Alcoholic Beverages Initiative

As noted above, the use of alcoholic beverages has been linked to various adverse health and family outcomes. The enactment of this measure could reduce these adverse consequences in two ways. First, the significant in- crease in alcohol taxes imposed under this measure would likely reduce consumption of alcohol beverages by consumers.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/100099.pdf