Results


2,890 results

Sort by date / relevance

AB32: Letter to Assembly Member Dan Logue Regarding Potential Economic Leakage [Publication Details]

May 13, 2010 - Specifically we were asked to look at the costs California would likely incur following the implementation of AB 32 through the California Air Resource Board’s Scoping Plan, compared to states that do not have similar policies in place.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/2277

[PDF] The 2014-15 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenue Expenditure Plan

AB 32 COI Fee. The ARB’s 2008 Scoping Plan considers several uses of cap-and-trade revenue, including the potential use of auction revenue to support the costs of administering AB 32. As we described above, such administrative costs are currently paid by the AB 32 COI fee.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/budget/cap-and-trade/auction-revenue-expenditure-022414.pdf

[PDF] The 2013-14 Budget: Resources and Environmental Protection

Similarly, the administration proposes to use revenues from the “AB 32 cost of implementation fee” and cap-and-trade auctions for new administrative activities. Given the legal constraints regarding the use of such revenues, we recommend that the Legislature seek Legislative Counsel’s guidance regarding the legal risks of these proposals.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2013/resources/resources-budget-analysis/resources-budget-analysis-021913.pdf

[PDF] Supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package

AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee. The Administration shall include, as part of the Governor’s January budget display, activities funded by the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee. The budget display shall include a separate schedule for climate change activities funded by the AB 32 Cost of
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/supp_report/supp_report_2012_052013.pdf

[PDF] Cap-and-Trade: Budget Conference Issues

There are likely legal restrictions on the use of cap-and-trade funds that require the funds be used in a way that advances the goals of AB 32. For example, the primary goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/conf_comm/2015/Cap-and-Trade-Conference-Issues-060415.pdf

The 2012–13 Budget: Cap–and–Trade Auction Revenues [Publication Details]

Feb 16, 2012 - These auctions are part of the state's plan to meet the goals of the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (commonly referred to as AB 32). In this report, we recommend that the Legislature first use the revenues in 2012-13 to offset General Fund costs of existing programs designed to mitigate GHG emissions.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/2563

Evaluating the Policy Trade-Offs in ARB's Cap-and-Trade Program - Evaluating the Policy Trade-Offs in ARB's Cap-and-Trade Program [Video]

Evaluating the Policy Trade-Offs in ARB's Cap-and-Trade Program - Evaluating the Policy Trade-Offs in ARB's Cap-and-Trade Program [Video] To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Evaluating the Policy Trade-Offs in ARB 's Cap-and-Trade Program February 9, 2012 In this video, Mark Newton, Tiffany Roberts, and James Nachbaur
https://lao.ca.gov/Videos/Player?playlistId=45

[PDF] Cap-and-Trade Market Issues

As part of its updated economic analysis completed in 2010, the Air Resources Board (ARB) reexamined the economic assumptions it used in the original 2008 AB 32 Scoping Plan (the board’s plan to meet the AB 32 goal of reducing California’s greenhouse gas [GHGs] emissions to 1990 levels by 2020).
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/resources/2011/Cap_and_Trade_Market_Issues_062911.pdf

LAO 2012-13 Budget: Funding Requests for High-Speed Rail

Would Not Help Achieve AB 32's Primary Goal. The primary goal of AB 32 is to reduce California's GHG emissions statewide to 1990 levels by 2020. Under the revised draft business plan, the IOS would not be completed until 2021 and Phase 1 Blended would not be completed until 2028.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/transportation/high-speed-rail-041712.aspx

[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: Funding Requests for High-Speed Rail

Given these considerations, the administration’s proposal to possibly use cap-and-trade auction revenues for the construction of high-speed rail raises three primary concerns. • Would Not Help Achieve AB 32’s Primary Goal.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/transportation/high-speed-rail-041712.pdf