To browse all LAO publications, visit our Publications page.
May 26, 2011 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
May 26, 2011 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education
May 25, 2011 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 25, 2011 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education Finance
May 25, 2011 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 1 on Health and Human Services and Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 24, 2011 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 on Education Finance
May 23, 2011 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 23, 2011 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 23, 2011 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance and Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 1 on Health and Human Services
May 23, 2011 - Presented to Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 on Education Finance
May 10, 2011 - In 2010-11, several County Offices of Education (COEs) reported difficulties balancing their court school budgets. Partly due to the concerns they raised, the Supplemental Report of the 2010-11 Budget Act directed our office to (1) assess whether county court schools have access to an appropriate array of categorical funds and (2) compare court school funding with funding rates for other alternative programs. Our review indicates that COEs, which allot funding to county court schools, generally have access to an appropriate array of categorical funds. Although access to categorical funds does not appear to be a problem, we did identify local cost pressures that could explain why some COEs are having difficulty balancing their court school budgets. While the state’s options for affecting these local decisions are limited, the state could take actions to reduce cost pressures on court schools. We also recommend the state standardize per-pupil funding rates across its alternative education funding system, which could also help COEs manage their court school budgets.
May 2, 2011 - In this webcast (approximately 10 minutes), analyst Rachel Ehlers discusses the LAO report "How Small Is Too Small? An Analysis of School District Consolidation."
May 2, 2011 - In this report, we investigate the competing claims made in support and opposition of combining smaller school districts into larger districts. We find some small districts’ spending patterns and student performance differ slightly from larger districts, but very small districts have notable and troubling differences. We also find that substantial funding advantages and certain disincentives keep small districts from opting for consolidation. Our analysis suggests the state should not pursue a one-size-fits all approach for district configuration or require all small school districts to consolidate, but it does suggest the state should remove existing disincentives. To increase efficiencies and accountability, we also recommend the state increase the minimum size for districts to at least 100 students.
April 14, 2011 - Presented to Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee
April 11, 2011 - Presented at CASBO 2011 Annual Conference (April 7, 2011).