2005 Initiative Analysis: The Transportation Funding Protection Act of 2006 (version 3)

In 2002, voters approved Pro position  42 which constitutionally requires this revenue to be transferred from the General Fund to the TIF for transportation purposes exclusively. Proposition  42 allows the transfer to be suspended under specified conditions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050903.htm

^[PDF] LAO 1999 Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on State Revenues

Of this total, .25 percent is deposited in county transportation funds, while the remaining 1 percent is allocated to city and county governments for general purposes. Cities receive the proceeds col- lected within their boundaries, while counties receive the proceeds from unincorporated areas.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1999/1999_pandi/part3/part3_pandi99.pdf

^[PDF] Enhancing Implementation and Oversight: Proposition 40 Resources Bond

Figure 1 Allocations of Proposition 40 Funds by Recipient Agency (In Millions) State Department $1,915.0 Parks and Recreation Acquisition and development of state parks 225.0 Parks and Recreation Local assistance 790.0 State Coastal Conservancy Land/water resource acquisition/restoration 200.0 San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy Program (Coastal Conservancy) Land/water resource
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/prop_40/prop_40_050702.pdf

LAO 2003 Budget Analysis: Resources, Department of Parks and Recreation (3790)

The department requests approval to enter into an operating agreement with the City of Daly City for the operation and maintenance of Thornton State Beach. The term of the agreemen t will not exceed 30 years.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2003/resources/res_15_3790_anl03.htm

LAO 2005 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Addressing Public Pension Benefits and Cost Concerns

Key Issues With Current Defined Benefit Plans In our research and discussions with state, county, and city representatives, a number of issues came up regarding the current retirement programs offered to state and local employees.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/2005_pandi/pi_part_5_2_Public_Pension_Benefits.htm

2000 Budget Analysis: General Government Depts #3

When the mandate was repealed, the board's workload associated with the city tax information ceased. However, the board did not take a corresponding reduction in its budget. Consequently, the board should now be able to absorb the workload associated with purchasing the tax information from the cities within existing resources.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2000/general_govt/gen_depts3_anl00.html

1996-97 Perspectives and Issues: Counties and the 1996-97 State Budget

Finally, transferring funding responsibility for GA to the state need not increase overall state costs, if this program shift of about $460 mi llion were offset by a comparable state-county transfer of program responsibility.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/p965-3.html

Major Features of the 2000-01 Budget, Part II

The state dedu cts this fee from the intergovernmental transfers that the state receives from public hospitals to finance DSH payments. Counties and the University of California will split the benefit of the reduction with private hospitals on a roughly equal basis.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/070300_budget_maj_features_2.html

Technology Transfer Agreements and California’s Sales Tax [Publication Details]

Jan 30, 2017 - Technology Transfer Agreements and California’s Sales Tax [Publication Details] Translate Our Website This Google ™ translation feature provided on the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) website is for informational purposes only.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/3541

Fiscal Outlook: Focus on Revenues [EconTax Blog]

Nov 14, 2018 - Under our growth scenario, General Fund revenues and transfers grow from $137.5 billion in 2018-19 to $159.3 billion in 2022-23. Our recession scenario is based on Moody ’s Analytics “moderate ” recession scenario.
https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/318