LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Employment Development Department (7100)t

The expectation was that these costs would be financed by higher employer taxes pursuant to the existing higher tax rate schedules described above. In other words, EDD projected that under the highest F+ tax schedule, the fund would weaken substantially, but would remain solvent.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/general_govt/gen_14_7100.htm

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Tax Relief (9100)

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Tax Relief (9100) Analysis of the 2005-06 Budget Bill Legislative Analyst's Office February 2005 Tax Relief (9100) The state provides tax relief—both as subventions to local governments and as direct payments to eligible taxpayers—through a number of programs contained within this budget item.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/general_govt/gen_17_9100.htm

^[PDF] LAO 2005-06 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services Chapter

LAO 2005-06 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services Chapter
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/health_ss/healthss_anl05.pdf

Eighth Annual LAO Analysis Quiz

(A) The more tax auditors the state hires, the greater the state budget deficit will become. (B) As more road accidents occur, CHP officers are spending more time responding to accidents instead of on activities to prevent them.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/quiz/analysis_quiz_041405.htm

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Department of Fish and Game (3600)

This fund receives revenues from hunting and fishing licenses and taxes, commercial fishing permits and fees, and environmental revie w fees paid by project proponents. Statute provides that many of these revenues can be used to support a broad range of programs related to hunting and fishing, as well as fish and wildlife protection and management activities.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/resources/res_10_3600_anl05.htm

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Transportation Funding Instability Continues

Specifically, our recommendation is to repeal Propo sition  42, replace it with an increase in the gas tax, and adjust the gas tax for inflation. These actions would provide about the same amount of money to transportation as Proposition  42 while freeing up General Fund revenues for nontransportation purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/transportation/tran_02_cc_trans_funding_anl05.htm

LAO 2006 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on State Revenues

Revenue Impact of Tax Amnesty In addition to the basic economic factors (such as profits and personal income) that affect revenues from the personal income tax (PIT) and the corporation tax (CT), another factor that is currently having significant revenue impacts on both taxes involves the cash-flow effects of the state’s recent tax amnesty program.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/2006_pandi/pi_03_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Perspectives and Issues: Major Expenditure Proposals In the 2006-07 Budget

By shifting property taxes to local government, the state met the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee by increasing General Fund spending to backfil l the reallocated property tax revenues. These transfers total $6.8 billion in 2006-07.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/2006_pandi/pi_05_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan

The remaining 27 percent of funding ($59 billion) would come from new sources, such as revenue bonds backed by gas tax and weight fee revenues, private investments in transportation facilities, and fees to be charged on water users.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/cap_outlay/co_02_anl06.html

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: California Community Colleges (6870)

As a result of tax base differences that predate Proposition 13 in 1978, coupled with complex district allocation formulas, community college districts receive different amounts of funding to serve their students.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/education/ed_25_6870_anl06.html