Supplements A-C: California Tax Policy and the Internet

SUPPLEMENT C SELECTED PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT Taxes Prohibited by the Federal Internet Tax Freedom Act The federal Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) prohibits Internet access taxes and multiple or discriminatory taxes on Internet activity.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/013100_inet_tax/013100_internet_sup1.html

AB 676 Assembly Bill - CHAPTERED

(a) Calif ornia's property owners pay over $20 billion each year in property taxes, making the property tax the third largest nonfederal tax in the state. (b) While most California cities , counties, special districts, redevelopment agencies, and schools are highly reliant upon property taxes, the state's system for allocating these revenues to local governments is seriously flawed.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/020300_ab8/ab_676_bill_19990713_chaptered.html

^[PDF] Major Milestones: 43 Years of Care and Treatment Of the Mentally Ill

Realignment Major shift of authority from state to counties for mental health and other health programs. Funding changes were intended to be fiscally neutral and included: new sales and vehicle license fee taxes and changed state/county cost sharing ratios in health and social service programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/030200_mental_illness/030200_mental_illness.pdf

^[PDF] Extended School Year Program At Compton Unified School District: Report on Program EffectivenessExtended School Year Program At Compton Unified School District: Report on Program Effectiveness

We further recommend dedicating a percent- age of ESY program funds for testing, data collection, and evaluation. 2 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Legislative History In 1993, in response to serious fiscal and academic problems, the state assumed ad- ministrative control of the Compton Unified School District (CUSD) in Los Angeles County.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/050200_compton_schools.pdf

^[PDF] May 8, 2000 The 2000-01 Senate Budget Bill SB 1344 (Peace) As Adopted by the Budget and Fiscal Review Committee

Board of Corrections • Construction of county juvenile detention facilities • No proposal. • Augmented to use federal funds for county facilities. • $40 million cost (federal funds). • Grants for local law enforcement programs • No proposal. • Augmented to expand exist- ing and establish new programs. • $65.5 million cost.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/050800_senate_floor_packet.pdf

Traveling in California: The Transportation System—How Decisions Are Made

SHOPP and STIP Expenditures by County (In Millions)
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/051100_cal_travels/051100_cal_travels_decisions.html

Traveling in California: Issues for Legislative Consideration

. • In order to make this feasible, alternative flexible fund sources, such as the General Fund or local sales taxes, must be available to substitute for federal funds. Can Caltrans Hire Enough Staff to Perform the Work?
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/051100_cal_travels/051100_cal_travels_issues.html

^[PDF] An LAO Overview of the 2000-01 May Revision

Plan concentrates funds in urban areas with many other counties (primarily rural counties) receiving minimal amounts for deferred maintenance. Are there needs in these areas that merit consideration?
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/051700_may_revision/051700_may_revision.pdf

^[PDF] The 2000-01 Assembly Budget Bill AB 1740 (Ducheny) As Adopted by the Budget Committee

. • — Tax Relief • Provides $2.6 billion in various tax relief proposals. • Provides $2.6 billion in un- specified tax relief and $100 million for the low-in- come housing tax credit. • $142 million cost. 6 L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C EMay 26, 2000 The 2000-01 Assembly Budget Bill General Fund Condition (In Millions) þ The Governor proposes a 2000-01 General Fund reserve of $1.8 billion.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/052600_assembly_floor_packet/052600_assembly_floor_packet.pdf

Major Features of the 2000-01 Budget

This action eliminates a deficit in school district and county office of education revenue limits that existed since the early 1990s, when the state did not fully f und COLAs. It provides a significant increase in general purpose funding for school districts (about 7 percent) and county offices (about 9 percent).
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/070300_budget_maj_features.html