Overview of the 2004-05 May Revision

On the revenue side, we do have differences from the administration with respect to individual tax projections —namely, we project that sales taxes will be stronger and that corporation taxes will be weaker than assumed in the May Revision.
https://lao.ca.gov/2004/may_revision/011704_may_revision.htm

2009-10 Budget Analysis Series: Transportation [Publication Details]

Feb 3, 2009 - The specific actions the Legislature can take include more clearly setting funding priorities, providing more funding from ongoing sources by raising the per gallon tax on gasoline and diesel, and exploring new ways of funding transportation programs, such as charging a mileage-based fee to generate revenues for transportation.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Detail/1922

^[PDF] Highlights of the 2003-04 Analysis and P&I

The Governor’s Tax Proposal " The Governor is proposing an $8.3 billion total tax increase, of which $8.2 billion would be used to fund his realignment program and reduce the General Fund’s budget shortfall (see next section). 4 L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E A N L A O R E P O R T " This proposal involves raising the sales and use
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2003/03-04_budget_highlights.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of the Legislature’s Budget Package

Managed Care Organization (MCO) Tax. Adopts proposed MCO tax, as well as proposed allocation of tax’s fiscal benefit toward replacing General Fund support in Medi-Cal, increasing certain Medi-Cal provider rates, and providing other augmentations.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2023/Budget-Package-Overview-061423.pdf

LAO 2005 Budget Analysis: Transportation Funding Instability Continues

Specifically, our recommendation is to repeal Propo sition  42, replace it with an increase in the gas tax, and adjust the gas tax for inflation. These actions would provide about the same amount of money to transportation as Proposition  42 while freeing up General Fund revenues for nontransportation purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2005/transportation/tran_02_cc_trans_funding_anl05.htm

^[PDF] The No Urban Casino Act (version 1)

For instance, to the extent that casinos result in increased taxable economic activity (above what otherwise would have occurred), state and local governments receive increased tax revenues (from the income, sales, and property taxes, for example).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050136.pdf

^[PDF] Urban Tribal Casinos

For instance, to the extent that casinos result in increased taxable economic activity (above what otherwise would have occurred), state and local governments receive increased tax revenues (from the income, sales, and property taxes, for example).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050138.pdf

^[PDF] "The People's Gaming Act"

This measure could significantly increase local tax revenues (such as property and sales taxes) for Adelanto and surrounding communities as a result of gaming-related increases in economic activity. The level of increase is unknown but could potentially total more than $1 million annually.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2003/030129.pdf

^[PDF] Punitive Damages

Second, since punitive damage awards are subject to state income tax, it could potentially reduce state income tax revenues depending on individual taxpayers’ situations and how the money that is not awarded would otherwise be used.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/051018.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of California Community Colleges (CCC) Conference Issues

May 2017 Page 2 CCC Proposition 98 Funding by Source (In Millions) 2015-16 General Fund $5,384 $5,384 $5,384 — Local property tax 2,631 2,631 2,631 — Totals $8,016 $8,016 $8,016 — 2016-17 General Fund $5,489 $5,489 $5,489 — Local property tax 2,753 2,753 2,753 — Totals $8,242 $8,242 $8,242 — 2017-18 General Fund $5,674 $5,617 $5,674 -$57 Local property
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Conf_Comm/2017/Overview-CCC-Conference-Issues-53117.pdf