^[PDF] MOU Fiscal Analysis: Bargaining Unit 13

MOU Fiscal Analysis: Bargaining Unit 13 Presented to: The California Legislature Pursuant to Section 19829.5 of the Government Code MOU Fiscal Analysis: Bargaining Unit 13 L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E August 25, 2014 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE 1L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E August 25, 2014 LAO 70 YEARS OF SERVICE  Earlier Proposed Agreement Rejected by Employees.
https://lao.ca.gov/MOU/2014/MOU-BU-13-082514.pdf

^[PDF] High Priority Schools Grant Program Expansion

High Priority Schools Grant Program Expansion Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 2 May 6, 2003 High Priority Schools Grant Program Expansion L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E LAO 60 YEARS OF SERVICE LAO 60 YEARS OF SERVICE 1L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E May 6, 2003 Issues for the Legislature to Consider !
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/Education/2003/HPSGP_050603.pdf

2013 Initiative Analysis: Jobs and Education Development Initiative (JEDI) Act (Amendment #1-NS).

In Test 1 years, the state provides a fixed share of General Fund revenues to schools (roughly 40  percent). Thus, in Test 1 years changes in education property tax revenues have no effect on state education costs but affect the total funding schools and community colleges receive.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130773.aspx

^[PDF] Initiative Letter

In Test 1 years, the state provides a fixed share of General Fund revenues to schools (roughly 40 percent). Thus, in Test 1 years changes in education property tax revenues have no effect on state education costs but affect the total funding schools and community colleges receive.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130773.pdf

^[PDF] Property tax assessment.

This increases property taxes for local governments and schools. Over the next few years, schools and local governments each probably will gain hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Over time, these gains will grow resulting in schools and other local governments each gaining $1 billion or more per year.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2021/210488.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: Transportation Chapter

A-25 11. Decrease in Highway Capital Outlay. Highway capital outlay expenditures will decrease in 1994-95. Expenditures A-28 Findings and Recommendations A - 61 Analysis Page on seismic retrofit will constitute the only significant increase over the current-year. 12.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/Transportation_anl94.pdf

^[PDF] The 2011-12 Budget: To Defer or Not Defer? An Analysis of the Effects of K-12 Payment Deferrals

Without either deferral, however, school districts would be receiving funding in 2011‑12 roughly sufficient to support the programmatic level in effect when they began the 2010‑11 school year. That is, if one uses the beginning of the 2010‑11 school year as a point of reference, a new deferral would not be needed
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2011/education/k12_deferrals_012411.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: Business & Labor Chapter

The department's report shows that the HCD will have spent $30 million to administer the RHCP, FHDP, and CHRP through the end of the budget year—and that the department will spend about $200 million to administer these programs for the term of the regulatory agreements (generally 25 to 50 years).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/Business_and_labor_anl94.pdf

Analysis of School District Reserves

New Reserve Requirements School District Reserves Capped in Some Years School District Reserves Capped in Years Following Deposits in New State School Reserve. Chapter 32, Statutes of 2014 (SB 858, Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), included a provision capping district reserves in certain years.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/edu/district-reserves/district-reserves-012115.aspx

2003 Budget Analysis: P&I, Part 1

Realignment Plan Is Well Suited for Funding Mandates The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse schools and other local agencies if it "mandates " a new program or higher level of service.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2003/2003_pandi/pi_part_5b_realignment_anl03.html