Highlights of the 2007-08 Analysis

This would generate major one-time and ongoing savings while still providing enough funding to support a K-14 baseline budget in 2007-08. ( Analysis, page E-25 .) Five-Year Forecast Shows Large Increases on the Horizon Our five-year forecast projects Proposition 98 funding would increase significantly more than needed to cover current program costs (adjusted for inflation and attendance growth).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/highlights/analysis_highlights_022107.aspx

^[PDF] California's Fiscal Outlook: LAO Projections 2005-06 Through 1010-11

These local property tax transfers are backfilled by the state providing additional General Fund revenues to schools to meet the Proposition 98 spending levels for those years. Transfers of Local Property Tax Revenues From Schools to Local Governments (In Millions) Vehicle License fee (VLF) backfill $4,075 $4,903a $5,418 $5,872 “Triple flip”b
https://lao.ca.gov/2005/fiscal_outlook/fiscal_outlook_05.pdf

2023-24 Changes in Proposition 98 Spending [EdBudget]

Jan 17, 2023 - 2023-24 Changes in Proposition 98 Spending [EdBudget] a Applies to special education, child nutrition, and Child and Adult Care Food Program. b Consists of $1.2 billion in 2021-22 funding and $199 million in reappropriated funds. c Reflects additional LCFF costs associated with serving more students in transitional kindergarten, including costs of lower transitional kindergarten staffing ratios.
https://lao.ca.gov/Education/EdBudget/Details/698

The 2018-19 Budget: California Education Learning Lab

Feb 15, 2018 - These include: ( 1)  d isproportionate attendance at elementary and secondary schools that have less qualified math and science teachers, ( 2)  l ess access to advanced STEM courses in high school, ( 3)  d ifferent parental expectations about studying STEM in college, ( 4)  l ack of exposure to role models and mentors with a STEM background, ( 5)  p erceptions of
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3754

LAO 2006 Budget Analysis: Department of Mental Health (4440)

Recently, however, we were advised by state hospital administrators that the remaining population of 50 in this unit is down by half to a total of 25 patients. As a result, we are advised that DMH had held up the bidding process for an estimated $8.8 million project to construct an on-site school building at MSH for these clients, and is reviewing wh ether the current population (if it holds) is sufficient to justify the continuation of this unit.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2006/health_ss/hss_12_4440_anl06.html

A Review of the Teacher Layoff Process in California

On the one hand, allowing districts to reduce their staff throughout the school year could cause disruptions in the classroom for students and increase the difficulty laid off teachers have finding employment for the rest of the school year.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/edu/teacher-layoffs/teacher-layoffs-032212.aspx

^[PDF] Environmental sustainability education in schools.

This measure requires each teacher and student in a public school to receive 30 hours of education on environmental sustainability and sustainable best practices every two years. Topics may focus on Mr.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2021/210187A1.pdf

2001 Budget Analysis: Algebra Incentive Program

For example, Chapter 1024, Statut es of 2000 (SB 1354, Poochigian), requires students in grades 7 through 12 to complete an algebra course as a condition of receiving a high school diploma, commencing with the 2003 -04 school year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2001/education/ed_09_Algebra_anl01.htm

Weekly Unemployment Claims Update: April 19-April 25 [EconTax Blog]

Apr 30, 2020 - Weekly Unemployment Claims Update: April 19-April 25 [EconTax Blog] Weekly Unemployment Claims Update: April 19-April 25 April 30, 2020 Chas Alamo Unemployment claims are a   useful indicator  of the health of the state’s economy.
https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/459

^[PDF] LAO 2004 Budget Analysis: 2004-05 P&I Chapter

Major changes include an ad- ditional 25 percent grant reduction for families who remain in sanction status for more than one month, a 25 percent sanction on families who have reached their five-year time limit and are not working, and limiting the range of activities that count as work participation.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2004/2004_pandi/pandi_04.pdf