^[PDF] Overview of the Governor's Proposition 98 May Revision Proposal

Overview of the Governor's Proposition 98 May Revision Proposal January; Budget May;; Revision Change K-12;Education General Fund $30,844 $32,022 $1,178 $32,023 $30,927 -$1,096 Local property tax revenue 13,237 12,105 -1,133 11,950 11,529 -422 Subtotals ($44,082) ($44,127) ($45) ($43,974) ($42,456) (-$1,518) California;Community;Colleges General Fund $3,722 $3,722 — $3,981 $3,991
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2010/Prop_98_May_Revision_052510.pdf

^[PDF] AB 3632 Mental Health Services

Possible sources include federal special education funding, Proposition 98 funding, local property taxes (including funds redirected from redevelopment projects), and/or Proposition 63 funds.  Convene Work Group to Address Transitional Issues.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2011/AB_3632_Mental_Health_Services_020711.pdf

^[PDF] Proposition 98: Overview of May Revision Proposals

Increase of $2.7 billion due to baseline improvements.  Tax Proposals. Net decrease of $375 million from Governor’s January General Fund tax proposal.  If Governor’s May General Fund tax package were rejected, minimum guarantee would decrease by $1.7 billion.  Rebenching.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2011/Proposition_98_Overview_of_May_Revision_Proposals_052511.pdf

^[PDF] State Budget Update Presented to CA Charter Schools Conference

.  Assumes voters approve November 2012 tax measure.  Proposes $5.4 billion in trigger reductions if measure fails.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2012/state-budget-update-charter-schools-conference-022912.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of Proposition 98 Budget Proposals

Governor’s Estimates of the Proposition 98 Minimum Guarantee (In Millions) 2017-18 2018-19 Change From 2017-18 RevisedEnacted Revised Change Estimated Minimum Guarantee $74,523 $75,211 $687 $78,324 $3,114 Funding sources: General Fund $52,631 $52,741 $109 $54,564 $1,823 Local property tax 21,892 22,470 578 23,761 1,291 2L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E February
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2018/Overview_Proposition_98_Budget_Proposals_022118.pdf

^[PDF] Non-Education Mandates and the 2012-13 State Budget

Most of these mandates pertain to public safety or tax collection.  Proposes to “Repeal” (Render Optional) 32 Mandates. The administration proposes trailer bill language to specify that these provisions are not required.  All of these mandates have been suspended for at least two years; seven have been suspended since 1990.  To ensure that these mandates are not reactivated if
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/localgov/2012/Non_Ed_Mandates_3_13_12.pdf

The Health Care Safety Net

The Tobacco Tax and Health Protection Act of 1988 (Proposition 99) allocates a portion of tobacco tax revenues for county health services. In 1989, the Legislature established the California Healthcare for Indigents Program (CHIP) and the Rural Health Services (RHS) Program, which allocate Proposition 99 funds to expand county indigent health services.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/pre_1999/ho112895.html

^[PDF] 2003 Realignment

Politics, Aristotle (about 350 BCE) LAO 60 YEARS OF SERVICE L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E March 7, 2003 Overarching Considerations Relating to Realignment Realigning Some State-County Programs Makes Sense Programs, Not Taxes, Should Be the Focus of Realignment Realignment Plans Are Not Easily Changed Counties Will Need Control Over Realigned Programs Roughly
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2003/Presentation_for_SS.pdf

^[PDF] Economic Impact of Human Services Budget Reductions

Tax increases take money from the private sector and may create disincentives to expand or maintain business activity. Spending reductions and tax increases result in some level of economic contraction.  State Budget Small in Comparison to California’s Economy.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2010/Human_Services_Budget_Reductions_03_09_10.pdf

^[PDF] Overview on Poverty

These criticisms include (1) not accounting for changes in household expenditure trends or regional differences in cost of living, and (2) ignoring government benefi ts and certain taxes.  A Consistent Measuring Stick.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2011/Poverty_Overview_05_10_11.pdf