^[PDF] The Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014

The state began to pay down its existing school deferrals in 2012-13, when state revenues increased significantly. For example, the state eliminated the February-to-July deferral and returned the payment to its original schedule, incurring $2 billion in one-time costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130575.pdf

^[PDF] Fund Schools on Time Act of 2014-Version 3

The state began to pay down its existing school deferrals in 2012-13, when state revenues increased significantly. For example, the state eliminated the February-to-July deferral and returned the payment to its original schedule, incurring $2 billion in one-time costs.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2013/130657.pdf

2011 Initiative Analysis:Government Spending Limit Act of 2012-Amendment #1S

Proposal This measure makes changes to the state ’s constitutional spending limit and legislative vote requirements for certain tax increases. State and Local Spending Limit Changes Changes Base Year for State Spending Limit.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110785.aspx

2012 Initiative Analysis: Government Spending Limit Act of 2012

Proposal This measure makes changes to the state ’s constitutional spending limit and legislative vote requirements for certain tax increases. State and Local Spending Limit Changes Changes Base Year for State Spending Limit.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2012/120206.aspx

2009 Initiative Analysis: Best Practices Budget Accountability Act (Version 2)

Background The State Budget Process The State Constitution gives the Legislature power to appropriate state funds and make midyear adjustments to those appropriations. The annual state budget act is the Legislature's primary method of authorizing expenses for a particular fiscal year.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090812.aspx

2009 Initiative Analysis: Government Spending Limit Act of 2010 [V-2]

Based on estimates developed at the time the state's 2009 ‑10 Budget Act was passed, the state's spending limit is $81  billion. The state's Department of Finance has estimated that the state appropriations subject to that limit were $51.4  billion, or $29.6  billion below the limit.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090779.aspx

2012 Initiative Analysis: College and University Funding and Accountability Act

Depending on whether the new state tax revenues are sufficient to satisfy increased state spending requirements on public universities and colleges, unknown effects on other parts of the state budget and the state General Fund.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2012/120545.aspx

^[PDF] The 2017-18 Budget: Governor’s Gann Limit Proposal

State subventions for community colleges are treated similarly to subventions for school districts. The portion of state support dedicated to equalization will be placed, along with state-supported categorical programs, in the state base.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2017/3596/gann-limit-030217.pdf

^[PDF] The 2015-16 Budget: Rethinking How the State Funds School Facilities

Anticipating demographic growth from the Baby Boom, state creates State Allocation Board in 1947 and begins providing state financing for school facilities. State Allocation Board provides school districts with state loans for school facilities from 1949 to 1978. 1978 State Role Dramatically Expands.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/budget/school-facilities/school-facilities-021715.pdf

^[PDF] Establishment of a state grand jury system

State Grand Jury Operating Expenses. The state would incur significant, unknown costs for operating the state grand jury system. These costs could range from several million dollars to tens of millions of dollars annually.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/010949_INT.pdf