2000 Cal Facts State Budget

Sales Tax Rates Vary by County Sales taxes vary from county to county, because of the optional sales taxes that counties can choose to levy. Sales tax rates can vary within a county as well, to the extent cities and/or special districts adopt additional optional taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/calfacts/2000_calfacts_state_budget.html

^[PDF] Campbell) Provides tax credit for

Campbell) Provides tax credit for generators. AB 9x (Richman) Requires local governments to identify sites for power plants. AB 27x (Koretz and Horton), SB 1x (Soto), and SB 16x (Soto) Provides tax credit for purchasing power generation equipment.
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/electricity/031301_electricity.pdf

A New Blueprint for California School Facility Finance

Specifically, when school districts propose local revenue measures, such as property tax debt overrides or Mello-Roos taxes, voters typically request information as to the scope of projects to be built or renovated.
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/school_facilities/050101_school_facilities.html

^[PDF] California Spending Plan 2001-02

The Legislature General Fund and Local Property Tax Revenue (Dollars in Millions) Change From 2000-01 Amount Percent University of California $3,357.7 $152.2 4.7% California State University 2,607.4 142.6 5.8 California Community Colleges 4,516.5 129.3 3.0 General Fund (2,686.0) (-6.7) (-0.2) Property taxes (1,830.5) (136.0) (8.0) Student Aid Commission 634.6
https://lao.ca.gov/2001/spend_plan/0901_spend_plan.pdf

^[PDF] The Budget Act and Related Legislation California Spending Plan 2002-03

Figure 8 Higher Education Budget Summary General Fund and Local Property Tax Revenue (Dollars in Millions) Change From 2001-02 Segment 2002-03 Budget Amount Percent University of California $3,223.9 -$107.8 -3.2% California State University 2,680.3 -27.2 -1.0 California Community Colleges 5,030.0 320.3 6.8 General Fund (3,016.5) (162.1) 5.7 Property taxes
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/spend_plan_02/0902_spend_plan.pdf

Water Special Districts: A Look at Governance and Public Participation

Some water special districts receive an allocation of property taxes from the base 1  percent rate in order to fund a portion of their activities—totaling $479  million in 1997 98. As a result of state allocation formulas, those water special districts that received property taxes prior to the passage of Proposition  13 in 1978, generally continue to receive property taxes today.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/water_districts/Special_Water_Districts.html

^[PDF] A Primer: Assembly Constitutional Amendment 11

(g) The annual amount transferred to the infrastructure fund, as required pursuant to subdivision (a), shall be reduced by an amount equal to the sales tax revenue in each fiscal year that is redirected to the Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Bus Trust Fund pursuant to Proposition 51 if that measure was approved by the voters in November 2002.
https://lao.ca.gov/2003/aca_11/020503_aca_11.pdf

^[PDF] Supplemental Report of the 2003 Budget Act

https://lao.ca.gov/2003/supp_report/supp_rpt_2003_budget_act.pdf

^[PDF] Cal Facts 2004: State and Local

This property tax shift reduced local governments’ revenue losses resulting from Proposi- tion 13’s limit on the property tax rate. In 1992 and 1993, the state permanently modified the property tax allocation formulas again.
https://lao.ca.gov/2004/cal_facts/cal_facts_state_local_2004.pdf

Tax Agency Consolidation: Remittance and Return Processing

One of the adverse consequences of having three separate tax agencies is the considerable confusion it creates for some taxpayers. The uncertainty regarding what tax agency is responsible for what tax results in additional compliance costs for certain taxpayers.
https://lao.ca.gov/2005/tax_agcy_consolidation/tax_consolidation_011005.htm