^[PDF] 2003 Realignment

Politics, Aristotle (about 350 BCE) LAO 60 YEARS OF SERVICE L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E March 7, 2003 Overarching Considerations Relating to Realignment Realigning Some State-County Programs Makes Sense Programs, Not Taxes, Should Be the Focus of Realignment Realignment Plans Are Not Easily Changed Counties Will Need
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2003/Presentation_for_SS.pdf

^[PDF] Federal and State Welfare Reform Overview

Following the assessment, counties and recipients will develop individualized welfare-to-work plans. Child Care. CalWORKs has a three-stage child care delivery system administered by county welfare departments (CWDs) and the State Department of Education (SDE).
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2008/Federal_state_welfare_reform_overview_4_9_2008.pdf

^[PDF] 080293.indd

Institutional Care Figure 1 Community-Based and Institutional Care Comparison of Costs (Cost Per Participant Per Year) State Federal Othera Totals Case-Management Services MSSP $1,570 $1,570 — $3,140 Linkages 1,296 — $375 1,671 Community-Based Care Services ADCRC 1,257 — 3,466 4,723 In-Home Supportive Services 4,096 6,115 2,195 12,406 Institutional Care Skilled Nursing Facility (Medi-Cal) 28,571
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2008/potential_outcomes_of_BBR_in_CDA_04_14_08.pdf

^[PDF] CalWORKs Maximum Monthly Grant and Food Stamps

CalWORKs Maximum Monthly Grant and Food Stamps High-Cost Counties Grant $723 $723 $694 $694 $585 Food Stamps 423 486 495 498 526 Totals $1,146 $1,209 $1,189 $1,192 $1,111 Percent of Povertya 75% 79% 78% 78% 73% Low-Cost Counties Grant $689 $689 $661 $661 $557 Food Stamps 433 496 505 508 526 Totals $1,122 $1,185 $1,166 $1,169 $1,083 Percent of Povertya 74% 78% 76% 77% 71% a Compares grant level to federal poverty guideline.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2010/CalWORKs_Grants_02_02_10.pdf

^[PDF] Economic Impact of Human Services Budget Reductions

Tax increases take money from the private sector and may create disincentives to expand or maintain business activity. Spending reductions and tax increases result in some level of economic contraction.  State Budget Small in Comparison to California’s Economy.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2010/Human_Services_Budget_Reductions_03_09_10.pdf

^[PDF] Overview on Poverty

These criticisms include (1) not accounting for changes in household expenditure trends or regional differences in cost of living, and (2) ignoring government benefi ts and certain taxes.  A Consistent Measuring Stick.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2011/Poverty_Overview_05_10_11.pdf

^[PDF] Information-Technology-Procurement-and-Implementation-Overview

.  Enterprise Data to Revenue Project, which will modernize the state’s taxpayer return and tax revenue collection systems.  Los Angeles Eligibility, Automated Determination, Evaluation, and Reporting Replacement System, which will determine eligibility and benefi ts for a variety of public assistance programs.  Medicaid Management Information System, which will process
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2014/IT-Procurement-041014.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of Proposition 89

Other Provisions 10L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E September 27, 2006 Revenue Sources Increases tax rate on corporations and fi nancial institutions. For corporations, tax rate would increase from 8.84 percent to 9.04 percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2006/OV_Prop_89_09_27_06.pdf

^[PDF] California's Fiscal Outlook

California's Fiscal Outlook Impressive Progress on Balancing 2009-10 State Budget… Spending-related reductions • $15.4 billion Temporary tax increases • $12.5 billion Lottery and other borrowing • $5.3 billion Federal stimulus funds • $8.5 billion assumed in the budget package LAO Impressive Progress on Balancing 2009-10 State Budget… (Continued) Wide array of solutions to attack
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2009/California's_Fiscal_Outlook_03_24_09.pdf

^[PDF] Local Economic Development Tools

While economic development requires a mix of types of developments, cities and counties face signifi cant fi scal incentives to approve major sales tax generating developments.  Redevelopment Oversight Boards Likely Will Have Valuable Perspectives.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2012/Local_Economic_Development_3_7_12.pdf