2004 Initiative Analysis: Public employee retirement contributions

Over the last 25 years, the state has paid between 12  percent and 21  percent annually on average for most of its employees. In total, the state and local governments have paid, on average, in the low billions of dollars annually for retirement cont ributions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050022.htm

^[PDF] The Fair and Fiscally Responsible Public Employee Retirement Act

Over the last 25 years, the state has paid between 12 percent and 21 percent annually on average for most of its employees. In total, the state and local governments have paid, on average, in the low billions of dollars annually for retirement contributions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050022.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: Mental Health Services Act

In other words, state and l ocal government spending levels for mental health programs would eventually be about $800 million a year less than would otherwise have been the case under the Mental Health Servic es Act.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050026.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 1)

At the state level, revenues are defined as “excess” if they exceed the appropriations limit over a two-year period. Such revenues are then divided equally between taxpayer rebate s and onetime appropriations to K-14 schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050036.htm

^[PDF] The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 1)

Twenty-five percent could be used for local school or highway construction projects. Any remaining funds would go to the Sales Tax Rebate Account. Moneys in this account would accumulate until there were sufficient amounts to allow for the reduction of the state sales tax rate by at least one-quarter cent for a 12-month period.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050036.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 2)

At the state level, revenues are defined as “excess” if they exceed the appropriations limit over a two-year period. Such revenues are then divided equally between taxpayer rebate s and onetime appropriations to K-14 schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050037.htm

^[PDF] The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 2)

Twenty-five percent could be used for local school or highway construction projects. Any remaining funds would go to the Sales Tax Rebate Account. Moneys in this account would accumulate until there were sufficient amounts to allow for the reduction of the state sales tax rate by at least one-quarter cent for a 12-month period.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050037.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 3)

At the state level, revenues are defined as “excess” if they exceed the appropriations limit over a two-year period. Such revenues are then divided equally between taxpayer rebate s and onetime appropriations to K-14 schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050038.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 4)

As a general indi cation, over the past 25 years, the current-law Test 2 cost-of-living factor increased about 1.2  percent per year more than the proposed Test 2 cost-of-living factor. Other Provisions.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050039.htm

^[PDF] The California Deficit Prevention Act (version 4)

Thus, over time, the long-term school funding guarantee grows at a rate which is roughly similar to the appropriations limit. Test 3 and Maintenance Factor. K-14 funding can be reduced below the level required by Test 2 when either (1) the guarantee is suspended through a two-thirds vote of the Legislature or (2) an alternative funding formula becomes operative during low- revenue years (“Test 3”).
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050039.pdf