^[PDF] Fiscal Effect on California: Congressional Welfare Reform Reauthorization Proposals

Allows states to transfer up to 4.25 percent of their TANF block grant to SSBG. • No change from current law. • Increases SSBG funding by $252 million in FFY 2005. (California would receive approximately $30 million.)
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/congress_welfare/8-02_congress_welfare.pdf

^[PDF] 1962 Budget Analysis: Water Resources

A substantial number of these personnel can be transferred to the construction of the State Water Facilities if the planning program is reduced. Finally, it has been noted that the department was unable to spend $909,194 in support and planning funds during fiscal year 1960-61.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1962/23_water_resources_1962.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Analysis: Health & Social Services Chapter

Thus, the elimination of these programs would, in effect, transfer responsibility for many pregnant women to the counties. These women would, however, be eligible both for pregnancy- related medical benefits under Medi-Cal and for food stamps.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/Health_social_services_anl94.pdf

^[PDF] Improving In-Prison Rehabilitation Programs

This is because the department does not want to leave a slot open until it can assign and transfer a high-risk, high-need inmate to the slot if there is a low-risk, low-need inmate who can fill the slot much sooner.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2017/3720/In-Prison-Rehabilitation-120617.pdf

^[PDF] The 2015-16 Budget: Implementation of Proposition 47

Funding for Treatment, Truancy Prevention, and Victim Services The measure requires that the annual savings to the state from the measure, as estimated by the Department of Finance (DOF), be annually transferred from the General Fund into a new state fund, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund (SNSF), beginning in 2016-17.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/budget/prop47/implementation-prop47-021715.pdf

^[PDF] Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act of 2008

Among the provisions that could increase state General Fund costs are: • The requirement that the state reimburse counties (and some cities) for the in- carceration of additional parole violators in jails; • The requirement that the state reimburse counties for Proposition 36 drug treatment services that the counties provide to parolees; • The provision directing CDCR to
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070843.pdf

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: State Fiscal Picture

The state is borrowing $300 million from the federal government and the City of Los Angeles to cover its share of local earthquake repair costs under existing law. The budget prop oses to make an initial loan repayment of $60 million in 1995-96.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/part1.html

1999-00 Perspectives and Issues: Overhauling the State's Infrastructure Planning and Financing Process

Currently, the state pays for state-owned infrastructure (suc h as universities, prisons, and state parks), but has also provided substantial infrastructure funding for local government (school districts, cities, counties, and special distric ts).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1999/1999_pandi/part5a/part5a_infrastructure_pandi99.html

LAO Analysis of the 1999-00 Budget Bill General Government Departmental Issues 1

LAO Analysis of the 1999-00 Budget Bill General Government Departmental Issues 1 434-695 aLicense fees vary by city population. Ideally, the ABC fee structure should generate sufficient operating revenue to fund needed ABC operations and establish a reasonable reserve.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1999/general_govt/general_govt_depts1_anl99.html

^[PDF] Housing-Related Tax Expenditure Programs

Figure 3 provides an illustrative example of the impact of the federal and state MID on the monthly costs in the first year of ownership and the average annual investment return of a California home purchase under one common set of conditions.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/State_Admin/2013/Housing-Tax-Expenditure-031813.pdf