Results


14,650 results

Sort by date / relevance

MASS TRANSPORTATION

In general, state law requires intercity rail services to recover 55 percent of their operating expenses with fare revenues (farebox return) by the third year of operation in orde r to continue to receive state funds.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/010195_calguide/cgtrans3.html

Los Angeles County's Fiscal Problem

It issued bonds to cover operating expenses in 1992-93 (Marina Del Rey) and in 1994-95 (to cover its pension fund liabilities). These actions raise the ongoing debt service costs t o the county. It used prior-year settlement payments and acceleration of future federal payments under the SB 855 program to balance its health budget in the 1992-93 through 1994-95 fiscal years .
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/071195_la_county/lacfin.html

Focus Budget 1995

The budget assumes enactment of federal legislation to collect delinquent state taxes from federal tax refunds and includes additional revenues from enhanced audit and collection activities by the state's tax agencies.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/080495_budget_highlights/fc080495.html

[PDF] The 1995-96 Budget Act and Related Legislation

Of the $30.4 billion in total funding, 90 percent is from state and local sources—77 percent provided under Propo- sition 98 and 13 percent from non-Proposition 98 sources. Non- Proposition 98 funding from state and local sources includes prima- rily (1) state General Fund payments to the State Teachers’ Retire- ment System and
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/092298_spending_plan/rp92295.pdf

State Spending Plan--Summary, Chap. 1 & 2

Most of the state's expenditures are from the General Fund. In 1995-96, General Fund expenditures will amount to $43.3 billion, or 74 percent of total state spending reflected in Figure 1. State Spending Trends since 1984-85 To put this year's budget into perspective, Figure 2 shows state spending trends since 1984-85.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/092298_spending_plan/rp92295a.html

A variety of factors could result in the General Fund

In addition to federal health and welfare reform, other federal budget actions could have significant fiscal implications for the state. PENDING LITIGATION There is a variety of pending litigation in which the state is involved.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/110195_fiscal_outlook/outchap5.html

New Funding Model for Special Education -- Part I

Figure 5 shows the distribution of federal, state and local expenditures for special education. Figure 5 does not include expenditures for the state special schools, which totaled $49 million in 1993-94.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/110195_special_ed/se1195a.html

New Funding Model for Special Education -- Part II

Nonpublic Schools/Agencies We propose that state support for nonpublic school placements and nonpublic agency services be rolled into the base allocation to be distributed along with other state support.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/110195_special_ed/se1195b.html

New Funding Model for Special Education -- Part III

A major contributor to variation in local funding is the unequal distribution of state support. The proposed funding model would equalize state funding and thereby help equalize encroachment across the state.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/110195_special_ed/se1195c.html

December 1995 California Update

As part of the state's overall budgetary solutions in the past several years, state transportation funds were used for purposes other than transportation expenditures. For instanc e, state transportation funds have been transferred to the General Fund for general purposes.
https://lao.ca.gov/1995/cal_update/cup1295.html