Results for snohomish county lodging tax


9,313 results

Sort by date / relevance

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE

.___________ 54,500 Increase ______________________________________________ ---=N-=-o-n-e RECOMMENDATIONS Amount budgeted ____________________________________________ $54,500 Legislative Auditor's recommendation _______________________ 54,500 Reduction __________________________________________________ ---::NC;-o-n-e ANALYSIS The 1951-52 budget provides for investigations in the following areas
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/30_social_welfare_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1951 Budget Analysis: CAPITAL OUTLAY

Never- theless, we believe that the need for additional capacity will continue to - rise through a war emergency period, and the pressures from overcrowded county jails and juvenile halls will continue to increase.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1951/34_capital_outlay_1951.pdf

[PDF] 1953 Budget Analysis: CONTENTS

Along with the fiscal trends, the bonded debt of the State should be considered in the light of commitments made against future general tax revenues. The bonded debt of the State, as of November 30, 1952, stood at 511.7 million dollars in bonds outstanding with 337.2 million dollars in bonds authorized but unsold.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1953/01_contents_1953.pdf

[PDF] 1955 Budget Analysis: Resources

The funds for the Marine Research Committee have been obtained from a privilege tax of 5 cents per 100 pounds on sardines, Pacific mackerel, jack mackerel, squid, herring and anchovies. The tax expires December 31, 1955, so that revenue will be less during the 1955-56 Fiscal Year than it has been during the current year.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1955/17_resources_1955.pdf

[PDF] 1955 Budget Analysis: Miscellaneous

In the March, 1954, survey of Los Angeles County, 69 "benchmark jobs" in 298 firms coverfng 43,026 employees were used as a sample. The sample attempts to take a cross section of . all types of industries in proportion to the whole industrial economy of the area.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1955/23_misc_1955.pdf

[PDF] 1956 Budget Analysis: Employment

We have in mind specifically statistical analyses such as that now being performed by the Franchise Tax Board with the use of an obso- lete type of punched card equipment. We recommend that a study be made,· with a report to the 1957 Session of the Legislature looking toward the possibilities of maximum use of this electronic installation by other state agencies on a contract
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1956/27_employment_1956.pdf

[PDF] 1959 Budget Analysis: Natural Resources

Based upon the results of such a de- termination, consideration should be given to the possibility of assign- ing a tonnage tax on minerals to defray part or all of the operations of the division somewhat as assessments are made by the Division of Oil and Gas on oil and gas production.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1959/17_resources_1959.pdf

[PDF] 1961 Budget Analysis: Motor Vehicles

The vehicle license fees are imposed in lieu of all taxes accord- ing to value levied for state or local purposes on vehicles of a type subject to registration under the Vehicle Oode whether or not the vehicles are registered under the Vehicle Oode.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1961/16_dmv.pdf

[PDF] 1962 Budget Analysis: Index

tefund of Payments of Taxes, Licenses and Fees _____________ :.. ____________ 660 !telief Corps Home, Woman's ____________________________________________ 611 !tehabilita tion Center (Corrections) ______________________________________ 89 Ftesearch and Statistics, Labor, Division of (Industrial Ftelations) __________ 367 !
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1962/29_index_1962.pdf

[PDF] 1965 Budget Analysis: Judicial

It hears certain appeals from jUdgments of the superior, munic- ipal and justice' courts situated in the Counties of Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Yolo and Yuba. 2.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1965/03_judicial_1965.pdf