^[PDF] LAO Letter

LAO Criticism #3: Assumes Other Local Agencies’ Use of Property Tax Revenues Would Not Yield Economic Benefits. Our report notes that CRA’s assertion that redevelopment was responsible for creating 304,000 jobs overlooks the economic and employment benefits that would have been generated by other local agencies’ use of these property tax revenues (had the funds not been redirected from them to redevelopment agencies).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2011/realignment/redev_letter_021611.pdf

^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: The Governor’s CalWORKs and Child Care Proposals

Depending on the specific funding structure for the new county-based system, local funding constraints and competing priorities could result in even more limited access to care for non-CalWORKs families.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/ss/calworks-child-care-022212.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1994 Budget Perspectives and Issues: AN OVERVIEW OF STATE EXPENDITURES

The budget also reflects a General Fund increase of $87 million to offset a net decrease in revenue from the local property tax. This figure represents the net effect of (1) an increase of $151 million related to a proposed property tax shift from the colleges to local governments that is part of the Governor's state-county restructuring proposal
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1994/1994_pandi/pi94part4.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1995 Budget Analysis: Business & Labor Chapter

The department also supervises the county agricultural commissioners and county sealers of weights and measures. The budget requests $200.8 million for the DFA in the budget year, an increase of $4.7 million (2.4 percent) over estimated current-year expendi- tures.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/Business_Labor_anl95.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1995 Budget Analysis: Higher Education Chapter

Sharing by the state was justified on the basis that state tax dollars paid for much of the UC's physical plant and person- nel (especially faculty salaries); consequently, the state should share in the income derived from such an investment.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/Higher_Education_anl95.pdf

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: The Joint Venture Program

This is, in part, because current law requires inmates to be paroled back to the county from which they were sentenced. Employers might not have enterprises in the same county. Improved Program Performance May Be Forthcoming.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chd5240e.html

Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill: Health and Welfare Agency Data Center

The DSS plan approved by the administration and funded by the Legislature is based on an automated system currently in use by Napa County, known a s NAPAS. According to the plan, counties would be phased-in with all counties operational on the new state system by the year 2000.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1995/chit4130.html

^[PDF] LAO 1996 Budget Analysis: Higher Education Chapter

LAO 1996 Budget Analysis: Higher Education Chapter University of California General Fund $1,825.4 $1,917.7 $2,041.8 $124.1 6.5% 1996 higher education capital outlay bond fund — — 10.0 10.0 —b Student fee revenues 456.6 476.3 483.3 7.0 1.5 Totals $2,282.0 $2,394.0 $2,535.1 $141.1 5.9% California State University General Fund $1,578.1 $1,673.8 $1,769.3 $95.5 5.7% Student fee revenues 341.6 343.6
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/a96f.pdf

1997-98 Budget Analysis, General Government Departments Part 1

This decrease is due mainly to the end of $6.4  million in one-time costs in the current year, supported by special fund loans (Contractors' License Fund and Tax Preparers Fund), for enforcement workload related to the Cemetery Act.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1997/general_govt_depts1-a_anal97.html

LAO Analysis of the 1997-98 Budget Bill

County Costs May Be a State Reimbursable Mandate. Once the DMH refers an SVP to the county counsel or district attorney, the costs associated with the civil proceedings are the responsibility of the counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1997/health_ss_crosscutting_anal97.html