1997-98 Budget Analysis: The Earned Income Tax Credit

1997-98 Budget Analysis: The Earned Income Tax Credit 1997-98 Budget Analysis: Perspectives and Issues February 1997 The Earned Income Tax Credit What Is the EITC? How Does It Affect the Work Incentives and Tax Burden of Lower-Income Workers?  
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1997/part5b_earned_income_tax_credit_pi97.html

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Proposal This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050083.pdf

^[PDF] "The California Live Within Our Means Act"

Bill Lockyer 6 March 2, 2005 Proposal This measure requires that a tax measure be subject to the two-thirds vote requirement if it results in a tax increase for any individual taxpayer—regardless of whether it raises or lowers aggregate taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050099.pdf

^[PDF] Beginning January 1, 1989, the Judicial Council will award

Beginning January 1, 1989, the Judicial Council will award grants from this fund to counties which participate in the Trial Court Funding Program for' purposes of improving court management and efficiency.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1988/03_judicial_1988.pdf

2002 Budget Analysis: Health and Social Services, Hospitals Facing Financial Headaches

Some of the cost of uncompensated care is offset by supplemental Medi-Cal reimbursements and subsidy programs for county facilities. For example, the County Healthcare for Indigent s Program provides funding to counties for uncompensated hospital, physician, and other health care services.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2002/health_ss/healthss_05_CC_HFFH_anl02.htm

^[PDF] An LAO Report Sheltering the Homeless: Alternatives to the Armories

The department could also provide technical assistance—through direct help, contracted assistance, or one-time planning grants—to counties trying to develop shelters. Similarly, we recommend that the progress re- ports required by law to be filed by the counties by June 30, 1998 be forwarded to the HCD for its disincentive for some counties to find alterna- review.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/120397_homeless/120397_armory.pdf

2007 Initiative Analysis: California Prison Population Reduction Act of 2008

Court-Related Activities and County Jails. This measure would result in additional state and local costs for the courts and county jails. Two factors primarily account for the increased costs. The first factor is the resentencing provision of this measure, which would increase court caseloads and increase county jail costs because jails would house inmates during the resentencing proceedings.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070678.aspx

^[PDF] 1973 Budget Analysis: Judicial

None GENERAL PROGRAM STATEMENT Under the provisions of Government Code Section 28206, the state and the counties share the salary cost of each, superior court judge in the following proportions determined by county population.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1973/04_judicial_1973.pdf

^[PDF] 1960 Budget Analysis: Executive Branch

The total for the 1959-60 fiscal year is in the vicinity of $3 million with such noteworthy instances as Los Angeles County at over $431,000, San Diego County at over $286,000, City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento at over $243,000, City and County of San Francisco at over $130,000, Contra Costa County at over $98,.000, etc.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1960/04_executive_1960.pdf

^[PDF] Tax to Fund Free State Resident Tuition at UC and CSU

Proposal Income Tax Increase. The measure creates two new PIT brackets starting in tax year 2013: for single filers, 10 percent on income between $250,000 and $500,000, and 11 percent on income in excess of $500,000.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110768.pdf