2009 Initiative Analysis: Marriage Equality (version 3)

Particularly in the near term, this could increase revenues to state and local governments (primarily sales tax revenues). Over the longer run, however, this measure would likely have little fiscal impact on state and local governments.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090611.aspx

^[PDF] The 2014-15 Budget: Proposition 98 Education Analysis

As Figure 4 shows, total property tax revenues in 2014-15 are $631 million higher than the revised 2013-14 estimates. The Governor estimates baseline property tax revenues will be $939 million higher than the revised 2013-14 level.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/budget/prop98/proposition-98-budget-021414.pdf

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT OF THE 2000 BUDGET ACT, 1100

Item 1730-001-0001--Franchise Tax Board 1. California Arrearage Management Project. The Franchise Tax Board, in cooperation with the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), shall, by April 1, 2001, provide a revised child support arrearage collectio n estimate to the chairs of the budget committees in each house and the Chair of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/supp_lang/2000_supp_lang_1100.html

1998-99 Perspectives and Issues: A Perspective on StateExpenditures

Property tax shifts enacted in 1992-93 and 1993-94 contributed significantly to the decline in education's share of total spending through 1993-94. These shifts replaced a portion of the state's education funding with an equivalent amount of local property tax revenues that were diverted away from local governments to schools and community colleges.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/p_and_i_1998/part4_expenditures_overview2_pandi98.html

^[PDF] California Cannabis Hemp & Health Initiative 2008

For example, the state could derive significant additional revenue if the Legislature exercised its option under the initiative to collect an excise tax of up to $10 per ounce on commercial production of marijuana products for personal recreational or religious use.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070772.pdf

1998-99 Perspectives and Issues: Perspectives on the Economy and Demographics, part 1

For example, the strength of California's economy is the single most importan t determinant of the levels of collections from personal income taxes, sales and use taxes, and corporate income taxes. Similarly, California's population and economic trends affec t spending in many of the state government's key program areas, including health and social services, education, and youth and adult corrections.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1998/p_and_i_1998/part2_economy1_pandi98.html

2007 Initiative Analysis: California Class Action Reform and Corporate Accountability Act

These new state revenues would be partly offset by a reduction in state income tax revenues. That is because, under this measure, the share of punitive damage awards paid to attorneys and plaintiffs would be reduced by the amount paid directly to the state, thus reducing the amounts that might otherwise be subject to state income taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2007/070694.aspx

Major Features of the 1997 California Budget

Major Features of 1997-98 Budget Taxes. The budget includes no changes to state tax law. The Legislature rejected the 10 percent phased reduction to corporate tax rates included in the Governor's original budget proposal, as well his July proposal for a phased 10 percent reduction in personal income tax rates.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/082297_bud_major_features/8_97_major_features_of_the_97_california_budget.html

^[PDF] Summary of Recommended Legislation

Specifically, we recommend that every school district be guaranteed a certain minimum revenue yield from a given tax rate so that all districts, regardless of their property tax base, are able to raise sufficient revenues to finance their local school facilities needs.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1988/02_88_summary_of_recommended_legislation.pdf

Highlights of the 2007-08 Analysis

Part V-Major Issues Facing the Legislature Governor’s Tax Proposals Make Sense The Governor is proposing to permanently eliminate the existing teacher retention tax credit, which was adopted in 2000 but was suspended in four of the past six years.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/highlights/analysis_highlights_022107.aspx