The Child Support Enforcement Program From a Fiscal Perspective: How Can Performance be Improved?

This occurs even though the additional spending would result in a net savings to the state (27 cents) as well as to the state as a whole when combi ning the state and county impacts (county cost of 5 cents and state savings of 27 cents).
https://lao.ca.gov/1999/041399_child_support_enforcement.html

Proposition 1A: Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act.

Background Taxes State Taxes. The State Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature for measures that result in increases in revenues from imposing new state taxes or changing existing state taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090781.aspx

^[PDF] The 1991-92 Budget: Perspctives and Issues

For many state taxpayers, increases in the amount of state personal income tax that they pay would be partially offset by a reduction in their federal income tax liability. This is because state income taxes are deductible in computing federal income tax liabilities (other state taxes are not generally deductible).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1991/pandi_91_part3.pdf

^[PDF] Ballot Analysis

State and local entities can consider sex when it is necessary as part of normal operations. For example, the state can consider the sex of an employee when staffing specific jobs at state prisons where it is necessary for staff and inmates be the same sex.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2020/Prop16-110320.pdf

^[PDF] 1967 Budget Analysis: Fiscal Affairs

The state through the State Lands Division staff has responsibility for establishing tract assignments of oil in connection with the state's representation on the Unit Equity Committee (after January 1, 1968 the state will have the majority vote).
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/1967/10_fiscal_affairs_1967.pdf

^[PDF] California Deficit Prevention Act

BACKGROUND State Finance The state spends money from two main types of accounts:  General Fund. The General Fund is the state’s core account that pays for most services. In the 2009-10 fiscal year, the state spent $87 billion from the General Fund, primarily on education, health and social services, and state prisons.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110297.pdf

^[PDF] Personal Responsibility Act of 1995: Fiscal Effect on California

Authorizes states to limit benefits for persons from another state to the grant level of the former state. Similar provisions, with exception for failure of certain contraceptive devices. State law does not pro- vide for vouchers.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/policy_brief_personal_responsibility_act_of_1995_fiscal_effect_on_california.pdf

2008 Initiative Analysis:The Ban on Destructive Human Embryo Research

State Laws Regarding Stem Cell Research. The State Constitution and current state statutes include various provisions governing stem cell research activities. Proposition  71, enacted by California voters in 2004, amended the State Constitution to establish a right to conduct stem cell research, as defined.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2008/080087.aspx

2011 Initiative Analysis:The California Clean Energy Jobs Act

Taxable profits at the state level have historically been based on the firm ’s property, payroll, and/or sales that occurred in that state. States set their own relative weights on these three factors.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2011/110748.aspx

^[PDF] LAO 1996 Perspectives and Issues: A PERSPECTIVE ON COUNTY FISCAL CONSTRAINTS

State contributions generally cover only part of the cost of providing a state-required pro- gram. For example, the state currently pays approximately 37 percent of the cost of the trial courts, with the counties paying the remaining 63 percent.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/p965-2.pdf