Results


417 results

Sort by date / relevance

Shift certain offenders from state prison to county jails.

May 27, 2010 - Also as part of the May Revision, the Governor proposes legislation to continuously appropriate $503 million annually from the General Fund for various local public safety progra ms beginning in 2011-12.
https://lao.ca.gov/Recommendations/Details/254

[PDF] 080280.indd

080280.indd Account Resources Needed Riverside $26,054 $35,014 $24,510 $10,504 $1,544 Sacramento 18,041 1,075 753 323 17,289 San Benito 741 419 293 126 448 San Bernardino 26,008 31,390 21,973 9,417 4,035 San Diego 39,734 10,033 7,023 3,010 32,710 San Francisco 10,373 — — — 10,373 San Joaquin 8,717 7,155 5,009 2,147 3,708 San Luis Obispo 3,397 1,405 983 421 2,414 San Mateo 9,407 5,953 4,167 1,786
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/localgov/2008/parole_realignment_proptax_redirection_031008.pdf

Senate Floor Packet

Adopts the Governor's May Revision proposals to defer $1.1  billion of current-year General Fund expenditures to the budget year, and replace another $503 million of current-year General Fund spending with funds from the Proposition 98 Reversion Account.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/floor_packets/052902_sen_floor_packet.html

Assembly Floor Packet

Adopts the Governor's May Revision proposals to defer $1.1  billion of current-year General Fund expenditures to the budget year, and replace another $503  million of current-year General Fund spending with funds from the Proposition  98 Reversion Account.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/floor_packets/053002_assem_floor_packet.html

[PDF] Infrastructure Bond Implementation: Higher Education

Proposition 1D Spending Program 2006-07 2007-08 Total Unspent University of California $340 $503 $843 $47 California State University 284 376 660 30 California Community College 432 479 911 596 Totals $1,056 $1,358 $2,414 $673 4L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E February 7, 2007 Governor’s proposal would provide a total of $11.5 billion in additional bond funding for the three segments in 2008 and 2010.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2007/Infrastructure_Bond_Implementation_020707.pdf

[PDF] Overview of the Governor's Proposition 98 May Revision Proposal

Instead overappropriation ($503 million) is counted as payment towards the $11.2 billion statutory obligation. (Would resume subsequent payments beginning in 2011-12.) ;; 2010-11. Depends on “rebenching” for elimination of child care. „ To rebench, the Governor no longer counts child care as a Proposition 98 expenditure and proportionally reduces the percentage of General Fund
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2010/Prop_98_May_Revision_052510.pdf

[PDF] The 2002-03 Assembly Budget Bill (AB 1777)

The Assembly approved the Governor’s proposals to (1) defer $1.1 billion of current-year expenditures to the budget year and (2) replace $503 million of current-year General Fund with funds from the Proposition 98 Reversion Account.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/floor_packets/053002_assem_floor_packet.pdf

[PDF] The 2002-03 Senate Budget Bill SB 1261 (Peace)

The Senate approved the Governor’s proposals to (1) defer $1.1 billion of current-year expenditures to the budget year and (2) replace $503 million of current-year General Fund with funds from the Proposition 98 Reversion Account.
https://lao.ca.gov/2002/floor_packets/052902_sen_floor_packet.pdf

Other Budget Issues

Also, reject proposal to continuously appropriate from the General Fund $503 million starting in 2011-12 to support various local public safety programs. Judiciary Court Security Fee Increase Reject Governor's proposed fee increase.
https://lao.ca.gov/Recommendations?SubjectArea=23&Year=2010

How Have Past Stock Market Downturns Affected Income Tax Revenue? [EconTax Blog]

Mar 9, 2026 - By most measures, the global financial crisis was more severe than the dot-com crash. The state 's unemployment rate, for example, peaked at 7 percent following the dot-com crash but reached nearly double that during the financial crisis and remained elevated for much longer.
https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/852