^[PDF] Economic and Budget Developments

The Gov- ernor also deleted $26 million from the com- munity colleges earmarked for program im- provement, and set aside the funds for other purposes, consistent with Proposition 98 fund- ing requirements.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1996/update_california_7-1996.pdf

The 2016-17 Budget: Department of General Services

Feb 22, 2016 - Governor ’s Proposal Shift GCP to DGS. The Governor ’s budget proposes to shift the GCP from VCGCB to DGS. As part of this shift, the budget transfers nine positions and $1.2  million in funding authority to DGS.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3362

^[PDF] UPDATE MAY 1997

This com- pares with a budget estimate of only about a 1 percent decline in the cur- rent year. Furthermore, the number of eligibles in most other Medi-Cal categories is growing more slowly than the budget had estimated.
https://lao.ca.gov/1997/cal_update/may_97_calupdate.pdf

^[PDF] The 1996-97 Budget Act and Related Legislation

The May Revision The May Revision to the Governor’s 1996-97 budget proposal reflected a major increase in both revenues and expenditures. On the revenue side, the administration raised its forecast by $1.2 billion for 1995-96 and $1.6 billion for 1996-97 (after ad- justing for changes in the estimated cost of the tax cut pro- Figure 4 Changes in Projected
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/100796_spend_plan/1996_spending_plan_1.pdf

^[PDF] Performance Budgeting Pilot Project

. ~ Proposed measures do not, for the most part, allow the Legislature to evaluate the DPR's progress from one year to the next with much consistency, because of the absence of baseline data or performance com- mitments which are good for only one year. ~ The administration's 1996-97 goal to have the DPR's entire program expressed in terms of budgeted funds and
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/performance_budgeting_pilot_project_(s)_subcommittee_2.pdf

^[PDF] Major Features of the 1996 California Budget Budget Brief

K-12 Program Impacts 1996-97 Baseline Increases. As discussed above, com- pared to the 1995 Budget Act, K-12 Proposition 98 funding increased by $2.5 billion in 1996-97. Of this amount, the ▲ K-12 Education Budget Summary 1995-96 and 1996-97 (Dollars in Millions) K-12 Proposition 98 General Fund $15,850.3 $17,237.9 Local property
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/071096_bud_major_features/pb71096.pdf

^[PDF] LAO 1996 Budget Analysis: Capital Outlay Chapter

(The first three projects listed in Figure 10 include a total of $150,000 for studies that the CDC indicates have been com- pleted; thus, these funds will not be needed for 1996-97.) Upon comple- tion of the preliminary plans that delineate the project scope and cost, the Legislature could consider requests in 1997-98 for working drawings and construction to complete these projects.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_1996/a96i.pdf

^[PDF] State's Fiscal Outlook Brightens

Over --------------------------------------------3 CAl UpdATE the current and budget years com- bined, General Fund caseload sav- ings should easily exceed our esti- mate of $108 million in the Analysis (which was based only on declining AFDC-Iinked eligibles), and could approach $200 million.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1997/update_california_5-1997.pdf

Major Features of the 1996 California Budget

This results in com bined General Fund cost avoidance and savings of $199 million in 1996-97. Implementation of the 4.9 percent grant reduction is contingent upon federal approval. The maximum monthly grant for a family of three will be reduced from $594 to $565 in high-cost counties and to $538 in low-cost counties.
https://lao.ca.gov/1996/071096_bud_major_features/pb71096.html

Next Steps for Improving State Accountability for Alternative Schools

During this period, however, API scores were not reported for many alternative schools. Figure 4 shows that in 2013 (the last year in which the state calculated API scores), the state published API scores for only half of alternative schools, compared to 97 percent of traditional high schools.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/edu/alt-ed/improving-accountability-051615.aspx