Follow-up Evaluation of the District of Choice Program

Feb 1, 2021 - The data show that show male and female students each accounted fo r 5 0  p ercent of the students using the program i n 2 018 ‑19. The variation among individual districts also is relatively small. When we examined individual districts with at leas t 5 0 t ransfer students, the share of female students ranged fro m 4 0  p ercent t o 6 0  p ercent.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4329

^[PDF] An Analysis of Findings From the San Diego Job Search and Work Experience Demonstration Program

Costs -:2 0 -2 1 0 1 Reduced Use of Treining Programs 50 -6 56 45 -7 52 Costs .' EPP Operating Costs -366 0 -366 -383 . 0 -383 EWEP Opereting Costs -73 0 -73 - 0a a Allowances and Support Services 0 22 -22 0 12 -12 Client Out-of-Pocket Expenses -15 -15 G 0
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1985/471_0585_an_analysis_of_findings_from_san_diego_job_search_and_work_experience_and_demonstration_program.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of May Revision K-12 and Early Eduction Proposals

PA G E 1 0 M AY 1 8 , 2 0 2 0 LAO Comments on Early Education Proposals X Package Does Not Assume Emergency Orders Continue „ In the current year, providers are required to maintain lower child-to-adult ratios and smaller group sizes.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/education/2020/Overview-of-May-Revision-K-12-and-Early-Education-Proposals-051820.pdf

^[PDF] 2009 Boards and Commissions Partially Updated

2009 Boards and Commissions Partially Updated Agricultural Labor Relations Board 1 Chairperson 4 Members $127,833 $123,897 $0 No Air Resources Board 1 Chairperson 5 Members $128,040 $39,332 $0 No Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board 3 Members $25,500 $0 No Board of Equalization 4 Members $154,875 $0 No Board of Parole
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/state_admin/2011/Boards_and_Commissions_060711.pdf

^[PDF] An Overview of the 1995-96 Analysis of the Budget Bill

LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S OFFICE Savings From Tax Reduction Proposal ~~~L, 1996 Through 1998 March 1, 1995 on Individuals, by Income Level" $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 40,000 34 29 66 56 96 82 60,000 74 63 142 121 206 175 80,000 130 94 252 181 365 263 100,000 210 151 407 293 593 427 150,000 410 283 807
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1995/an_overview_of%20the%2095-96_analysis_of_the_budget_bill.pdf

^[PDF] Overview of Major Human Services Proposals in 2020-21 May Revision

Joaquin Arambula, Chair P R E S E N T E D T O : L E G I S L AT I V E A N A LY S T ’ S O F F I C E Overview of Major Human Services Proposals in 2020-21 May Revision M AY 1 8 , 2 0 2 0 PA G E 1 M AY 1 8 , 2 0 2 0 Evolution of the Budget With the Exception of California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs), Changes in Estimated General Fund Costs for 2019-20 Are Relatively Modest.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/socservices/2020/May-Revision-Human-Services-Proposals-051820.pdf

^[PDF] Review of the Draft 2020 High-Speed Rail Business Plan

Unlike business plans, PURs are not required to be formally adopted by HSRA. gutter 2 0 2 0 - 2 1 B U D G E T 5 Project Delivery Project Divided Into Multiple Segments, Beginning With the Initial Construction Segment (ICS) „ HSRA plans to construct the system in two phases.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2020/4202/HSR-draft2020-041320.pdf

^[PDF] The 2020-21 Budget: California’s Fiscal Outlook

The 2020-21 Budget: California’s Fiscal Outlook The 2020-21 Budget: California’s Fiscal Outlook G A B R I E L P E T E K L E G I S L AT I V E A N A LY S T N O V E M B E R 2 0 , 2 0 1 9 L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E 2 0 2 0 - 2 1 B U D G E T gutter 2 0 2 0 - 2 1 B U D G E
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2019/4111/fiscal-outlook-112019.pdf

^[PDF] ALTERNATIVE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FUNDING FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY

U"'" ..0 C> '" s:: s:: .~ .~ '" '" :;, .~ '" '" s::.~ 4-(]J 0 ~ ...., ...., (]J 0 EU ...., .~ s:: OE .~ .~ "'''' s- s- 00 0.. ....,,,, (]J ~ (]J ..0 ~.~ C> 0'> s:: ~ (]J '" ..c: ....,~ ...., ~ ...., '" 4-", 0 ..0 0'" U .~ U "'0..
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/1979/01_alternitive_public_transportation_funding_for_los_angeles_county.pdf

^[PDF] The Administration’s Sacramento Office Building Construction Strategy: Ensuring Robust Oversight

Figure 1 Potential Superior and Good Development Sites Identified in Sacramento Office Planning Study Site Ownership Development Time Frame (Years) Location Superior Bonderson Building site State 0-5 Downtown Sacramento CalPERS site State 0-5 Downtown Sacramento Downtown Block 275 State 0-5 Downtown Sacramento Downtown Blocks 203 and 204 State
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2016/3516/oversight-office-construction-121416.pdf