Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - Under the measure, monies in TSW-RSTF would be considered tribal revenues that are distributed to federally recognized tribes in the state that either do not operate casinos or ope rate casinos with less than 350 slot machines.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039

California Tribal Casinos: Questions and Answers

Additional expansion of General Fund revenues would depend largely on how fast the tribes with 2004 and 2006 compacts bring new slot machines online. Given the pace at which the 2004 compact tribes have expanded and the economics of the casino industry, we expect that expansion of casino operations would be gradual, rather than sudden and dramatic.
https://lao.ca.gov/2007/tribal_casinos/tribal_casinos_020207.aspx

^[PDF] The Gaming Revenue Act of 2004

Those tribes that enter a tribal-state compact may operate slot machines (up to 2,000 each) and engage in banked card games, such as twenty-one. Currently, 61 tribes have tribal-state gaming compacts and operate 50 casinos with 54,000 slot machines.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2003/031060.pdf

2003 Initiative Analysis: The Gaming Revenue Act of 2004

In addition, Indian tribes with tribal-state gaming compacts are authorized to operate slot machines and other casino-style gaming in California. Card Rooms. The state allows card rooms to conduct certain “non-banked” card games.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2003/031060.htm

^[PDF] "Homeland Security Act of 2004"

Specifically, it authorizes banked games and slot machines at specified gaming establishments. Slot Machines. The measure allows an entity licensed by the CHRB to operate up to 5,000 slot machines. It also allows licensed card rooms to operate a number of slot machines, depending on the number of tables in operation as noted in Figure 1.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2003/030930.pdf

2004 Initiative Analysis: Tribal Fair Share Act of 2004

In exchange for agreeing to the provisions of the measure, tribes would be au thorized to operate up to 3,000 slot machines each. (As with current compacts, tribes would be limited to two facilities.)
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2004/040048.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The No Urban Casino Act (version 2)

These payments are based on numerous methods, including the number of slot machines operated by a trib e and the “net win” of the machines. In total, tribes currently provide state and local governments with annual payments totaling in the low hundreds of millions of dollars.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050137.htm

2005 Initiative Analysis: The No Urban Casino Act (version 1)

These payments are based on numerous methods, including the number of slot machines operated by a trib e and the “net win” of the machines. In total, tribes currently provide state and local governments with annual payments totaling in the low hundreds of millions of dollars.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050136.htm

^[PDF] Urban Tribal Casinos

These payments are based on numerous methods, including the number of slot machines operated by a tribe and the “net win” of the machines. In total, tribes currently provide state and local governments with annual payments totaling in the low hundreds of millions of dollars.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050137.pdf

2005 Initiative Analysis: The No Urban Casino Act (version 3)

These payments are based on numerous methods, including the number of slot machines operated by a trib e and the “net win” of the machines. In total, tribes currently provide state and local governments with annual payments totaling in the low hundreds of millions of dollars.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2005/050138.htm