Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - Specifically, such tribes must pay 15  percent of sports wagering revenue into the TSW-RSTF and 10  percent into the CHMHF —a total of 25  percent. This percent is applied to the amount of sports wagers made after deducting (1)  any wagers made with free bets or promotional credits (such as a wager made with funds provided by a tribe to a player as a promotion), (2)  all player winnings, and (3)  all federal gaming taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039

California gaming activities. [Ballot]

Oct 1, 2021 - This tax is applied to the amount of sports wagers made after deducting any payouts of winnings. The measure also imposes an additional 1 percent assessment —up to $10 million —to support problem gaming programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-009

Gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - For exa mple, such tribes would be responsible for reviewing what games or bets can be offered and what rules would apply (such as how payouts for winning wagers are calculated). However, the state would have some limited regulatory authority as well.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-030

Proposed constitutional initiative related to gaming activities. [Ballot]

Aug 1, 2018 - The state and local governments receive revenues from authorized gaming activities in different ways. For example, cardrooms and their owners along with winnings are subject to sta te and local taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2018-003

Proposed Constitutional and Statutory Measure Related to Gaming [Ballot]

Jan 3, 2020 - The measure imposes a 10 percent tax on horse racing tracks offering sports wagering. The tax is applied to the amount of sports wagers made daily after deducting any payouts of winnings. Under the measure, collected tax revenues will be deposited into a new special fund, the California Sports Wagering Fund (CSWF).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2019-029

Online sports wagering. [Ballot]

Oct 20, 2021 - The measure also imposes a 10  percent tax on entities offering online sports wagering. This tax is applied to the amount of sports wagers made after deducting (1)  any wagers made with free bets or promotional credits (such as a wager made with funds provided by a gaming operator to a player as a promotion), (2)  players ’ winnings and prizes, and (3)  all federal gaming taxes.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-017

Ending California’s “top two” primary. [Ballot]

Oct 10, 2017 - The winning candidate becomes the party ’s nominee at the general election. Political parties may allow voters with no party preference to receive their party ’s primary ballot or may restrict the primary only to those registered with the particular party.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2017-020

Proposed constitutional initiative regarding how Californians vote and the composition of the State Senate. [Ballot]

Oct 9, 2019 - Under this model, a candidate may win the election even though he or she was not the first choice fo r a majority of voters. Single- vs. Multimember Districts. An electoral district is a geographic boundary.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2019-013

Proposition 26 [Ballot]

Nov 8, 2022 - The proposition also requires the racetracks pay the state 10 percent of sports bets made each day —after subtracting any prize payments. These payments would go into a new California Sports Wagering Fund (CSWF).
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Proposition?number=26&year=2022

Sports wagering. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Background Gaming in California. State law limits the type of gaming that can occur in California. For example, state law currently bans sports wagering in California. However, state law allows certain gaming activities in the state.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-031