Online sports wagering. [Ballot]

Oct 20, 2021 - This tax is applied to the amount a person bets. Additionally, the measure authorizes DOSBC to take va rious enforcement actions, including requiring people making such bets to register with DOSBC, requiring entities illegally offering online sports wagering to disclose the names of people who make wagers with them, and blocking access to illegal sites accepting sports wagers.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-017

Gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - Banking games generally involve players betting against the “house, ” who is a participant in the game with an interest in the outcome, and percentage games generally involve the house receiving a percentage of the money involved in the game.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-030

Tribal gaming. [Ballot]

Dec 27, 2021 - For those under the state law framework, the measure authorizes CGCC to develop and implement various regulations —such as the types of bets that can be offered, licensing requirements, and consumer protection requirements.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-039

Sports wagering. [Ballot]

Dec 18, 2023 - At minimum, these regulations must limit wagering to (1) bets made by people age of 21 and older; (2) professional or college sporting events that do not include animals other than horses; and (3) amateu r sporting events that do not include children under the age of 18.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2023-031

California gaming activities. [Ballot]

Oct 1, 2021 - Banking games generally involve players betting against the “house, ” who is a participant in the game with an interest in the outcome, and percentage games generally involve the house receiving a percentage of money involved in the game.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2021-009

Revising the State Constitution. [Ballot]

Mar 24, 2026 - In addition, propone nts of successful constitutional revisions would be able to submit a certain number of initiatives to voters directly (without collecting signatures). Pursuant to subsection (c) of Section 9005 of the Elections Code, we are informing you that, in our opinion, a reasonable estimate of the net fiscal impact of this proposed initiat ive measure cannot be prepared within 50 calendar days.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2026-002

State enforcement of the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [Ballot]

Dec 19, 2025 - (Some Presidents have assumed office through means other than election, such as through succession.) Congress proposed the 22 nd Amendment in 1947 after the fourth presidential election of Franklin D.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-030

Immunology and immunotherapy. [Ballot]

Dec 17, 2025 - The amount would depend on how many funded projects successfully progress through the R &D process, generate new treatments, and reach the market. How long it might take for this revenue to materialize and to offset the state ’s bond costs is uncertain but could be decades.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-026

Relating to attorney fees and medical damages in motor vehicle accident cases. [Ballot]

Nov 24, 2025 - Attorneys declining cases could result in some Medi-Cal recipients not receiving compensation due to being unable to successfully pursue such cases. This would mean the state would be unable to recover as much of these funds.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-022

Time limits, environmental reviews, and judicial reviews for certain types of infrastructure projects. [Ballot]

Dec 10, 2025 - The change effectively would give the lead agency more discretion to make this decision, and the reby make it more difficult for project opponents to successfully challenge an agency ’s decision. In addition, under the measure ’s new provisions, a petitioner ’s challenge to an agency ’s approval of an essential project could only concern an agency ’s noncompliance with “objective
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-023