Personal income tax rates for high-income taxpayers. [Ballot]

Oct 20, 2025 - We estimate the measure would have the following major fiscal effects: Maintains $5  billion to $15  billion of annual state income taxes (in today ’s dollars) by making a tax on high income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.  
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-016

The 2026-27 Budget: California Highway Patrol Proposals

Mar 6, 2026 - (Accordingly, the Governor’s budget proposes undoing the $166 million current-year fund shift and letting the MVA reassume the associated costs.) However, several underlying causes of the MVA’s structural deficit remain unaddressed and the account is projected to become insolvent from the 2028-29 budget year onward.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5152

Cap-and-Invest: November 2025 Auction Update and 2026-27 Budget Context

Dec 9, 2025 - This revenue level would be insufficient to fully fund the $4.3  billion in statutory allocations under SB  840, let alone the additional $1.5  billion for activities specified in legislative intent discussed above.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5096

The 2026-27 Budget: Contract to Achieve Operational Efficiencies

Mar 10, 2026 - In doing so, we recommend that the Legislature weigh all its options ranging from letting the plan proceed as budgeted to rescoping or directing the administration to terminate the contract. If Legislature Moves Forward With the Contract, Require Quarterly Updates.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5156

2001 Initiative Analysis: Let the Voters Decide

2001 Initiative Analysis: Let the Voters Decide December 11, 2001 Dear Attorney General Lockyer: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed initiative constitutional amendment cited as “Let the Voters Decide” (File No.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011028_INT.htm

Let the Voters Decide

Let the Voters Decide March 27, 2001 Dear Attorney General Lockyer: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed initiative constitutional amendment cited as "Let the Voters Decide" (File No.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/010184_INT.htm

^[PDF] Let the Voters Decide, Amendment No. 1-S

Let the Voters Decide, Amendment No. 1-S SENATE ASSEMBLY DICK ACKERMAN ROY ASHBURN DEDE ALPERT PATRICIA C. BATES JIM BATTIN JACKIE GOLDBERG K. MAURICE JOHANNESSEN FRED KEELEY JACK O’CONNELL CAROLE MIGDEN RICHARD G.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2001/011028_INT.pdf

Ballot Detail

Ballot Detail This measure maintains the higher income tax rates established by Proposition 30 by making them permanent instead of letting them expire in 2031 (A.G. File No. 25 0016). Related Resources
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/BallotDetail?id=1493

Initiative Analyses

File No. 1999-071 Let the Voters Decide—Part B, Fair Election Districts Amend the California Constitution to change the way boundaries of districts for the state Legislature (Assembly and Senate), Board of Equalization (BOE), and the U.S.
https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiatives?page=76

Let the Voters Decide--Part B, Fair Election Districts

Let the Voters Decide--Part B, Fair Election Districts January 31, 2000 Dear Attorney General Lockyer: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed initiative constitutional amendment cited as the "Let the Voters Decide--Part B, Fair Election Districts" (Fi le No.
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/1999/990975_INT.htm