Results


1,926 results

Sort by date / relevance

Assessing California’s Climate Policies—Transportation

Dec 21, 2018 - Chapter 135 of 2017 (AB 398, E. Garcia) requires our office to annually report on the economic impacts and benefits of California’s statutory greenhouse gas (GHG) emission goals—statewide emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/report/3912

The 2015-16 Budget: Effectively Implementing The 2014 Water Bond

For example, Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006 (AB 32, N ú ñez/Pavley), requires a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Because California ’s water delivery and treatment systems are highly energy intensive, increasing water use efficiency can reduce energy use and associated GHG emissions.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2015/budget/water-bond/water-bond-021115.aspx

[PDF] The 2007-08 Budget Package (Revised 7/24/07)

Provides about $34 million, mainly from spe- cial funds, for actions at various departments to reduce green- house gas (GHG) emissions through implementing Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006 (AB 32, Núñez), including evaluation of market- based compliance mechanisms and development of early action measures, source-specifi c measures, protocols for voluntary early-action credit, a GHG emissions inventory, and scientifi c and economic analyses.
https://lao.ca.gov/2007/floor_packet/072007_floor_packet.pdf

LAO 2008 Budget Analysis: California State University (6610)

The segment also notes that additional funds may be needed to fund off –site mitigation costs (an issue we discuss in the “ Addressing Local Impacts of Campus Growth: Questions and Issues ” section in this chapter) and energy matching grants in support of AB 32 (Nuñez) greenhouse gas reduction programs.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2008/education/ed_anl08022.aspx

Highlights of the 2007-08 Analysis

Implementation of AB 32 Heats Up, but Leaves Legislature in the Cold The budget proposes a $36 million, multiagency effort to implement the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (also known as “AB 32”) to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emissions.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis_2007/highlights/analysis_highlights_022107.aspx

[PDF] The 2014-15 Budget: A Review of the 2014 California Five-Year Infrastructure Plan

For instance, the Legislature has expressed its commitment to achieving reductions in greenhouse gas emissions through the passage of AB 32 and other related legislation, which is likely to affect state infrastructure decisions around transportation and energy efficiency of state buildings, among other things.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/budget/infrastructure/infrastructure-plan-021014.pdf

The 2026-27 Budget: Proposed Elimination of State Environmental Positions

Feb 17, 2026 - For environmental positions, this amounts to annual savings of about $71  million (about $32  million General Fund). (For context, the budget assumes total savings of $487  million —$191  million to the General Fund —in 2026-27 and ongoing from the 6,002 positions.)
https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/5124

The 2014-15 Budget: Resources and Environmental Protection

The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006 [AB 32, N ú ñez/Pavley]), commonly referred to as AB 32, established the goal of reducing GHG emissions statewide to 1990 levels by 2020.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2014/budget/resources/resources-environmental-protection-022114.aspx

Changes in California Community Colleges Proposition 98 Spending, 2024-25 and 2025-26 [EdBudget]

Jan 21, 2026 - The Governor's budget also provides $32 million for enrollment growth in 2026-27. b The Governor's budget also includes $102 million in 2026-27 funds for this purpose. c Reflects $4 million for the Mendocino College Fire Academy and $1 million for the Santa Rosa Junior College Fire Academy.
https://lao.ca.gov/Education/EdBudget/Details/1040

[PDF] Assessing California’s Climate Policies—Agriculture

In 2016, Chapter 249 (SB 32, Pavley) extended the limit to 40 percent below 1990 levels— to 259 MMTCO2e—by 2030. As shown in Figure 1, emissions have decreased since AB 32 was enacted and were below the 2020 target in 2019.
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2021/4483/cal-climate-policies-121521.pdf