^[PDF] Supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package

AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee. The Administration shall include, as part of the Governor’s January budget display, activities funded by the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee. The budget display shall include a separate schedule for climate change activities funded by the AB 32 Cost of
https://lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/supp_report/supp_report_2012_052013.pdf

^[PDF] Cap-and-Trade Market Issues

As part of its updated economic analysis completed in 2010, the Air Resources Board (ARB) reexamined the economic assumptions it used in the original 2008 AB 32 Scoping Plan (the board’s plan to meet the AB 32 goal of reducing California’s greenhouse gas [GHGs] emissions to 1990 levels by 2020).
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/resources/2011/Cap_and_Trade_Market_Issues_062911.pdf

LAO 2012-13 Budget: Funding Requests for High-Speed Rail

Would Not Help Achieve AB 32's Primary Goal. The primary goal of AB 32 is to reduce California's GHG emissions statewide to 1990 levels by 2020. Under the revised draft business plan, the IOS would not be completed until 2021 and Phase 1 Blended would not be completed until 2028.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/transportation/high-speed-rail-041712.aspx

^[PDF] Overview of ARB’s Emission Reduction Goals and Planning Efforts in Transportation Sector

It also reviews and approves local air districts’ plans to reduce emissions from stationary sources.  The ARB’s draft 2015 mobile source strategy—a component of the SIP planning process—identifi es potential transportation emission reduction measures that could help meet air quality standards, as well as the Governor’s GHG reduction and petroleum consumption goals.  AB
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/resources/2016/Overview-ARB-Emission-Reduction-Goals-Planning-022216.pdf

^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: Funding Requests for High-Speed Rail

Given these considerations, the administration’s proposal to possibly use cap-and-trade auction revenues for the construction of high-speed rail raises three primary concerns. • Would Not Help Achieve AB 32’s Primary Goal.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/transportation/high-speed-rail-041712.pdf

The 2012-13 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues

The 2012-13 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues The 2012–13 Budget:Cap–and–Trade Auction Revenues Summary The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006 [AB 32, N ú ñez/ Pavley]), commonly referred to as AB 32, established the goal of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions statewide to 1990 levels by 2020.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/resources/cap-and-trade-auction-revenues-021612.aspx

^[PDF] The 2012-13 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues

The 2012-13 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues The 2012-13 Budget: Cap-and-Trade Auction Revenues MAC TAylor • l e g i s l A T i v e A n A l y s T • FebruAry 16, 2012 Summary The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006 [AB 32, Núñez/ Pavley]), commonly referred to as AB 32, established the goal of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions statewide to 1990 levels by 2020.
https://lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/resources/cap-and-trade-auction-revenues-021612.pdf

^[PDF] LAO's Analysis of AB 32 Scoping Plan's Economic Analysis

As is the case with the ARB’s exclusion of costs and savings for certain non- AB 32 measures discussed above, this lack of data for certain measures is another ex- ample of the incompleteness of ARB’s economic analysis of the scoping plan.
https://lao.ca.gov/2008/rsrc/ab32/AB32_scoping_plan_112108.pdf

^[PDF] Cap-and-Trade Expenditures: Overview of Governor’s Budget and Issues for Legislative Consideration

This ruling has been appealed, and fi nal decisions from the appellate courts on these issues may take years.  It is likely that the courts would require the state to target spending to GHG reduction activities since that is the primary goal of AB 32.
https://lao.ca.gov/handouts/resources/2016/Cap-and-Trade-Expenditures-021816.pdf

LAO Environment and Natural Resources

These auctions are part of the state's plan to meet the goals of the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (commonly referred to as AB 32). In this report, we recommend that the Legislature first use the revenues in 2012-13 to offset General Fund costs of existing programs designed to mitigate GHG emissions.
https://lao.ca.gov/Policy-Areas?areaId=10&category=0&year=0&page=20