Capital Outlay, Infrastructure Publications
To browse all LAO publications, visit our Publications page.
Funding Higher Education Capital Outlay
- Format:
- HTML
February 18, 1998 - Funding Higher Education Capital Outlay
Financing Priority Capital Outlay Projects
- Format:
- HTML
February 18, 1998 - Financing Priority Capital Outlay Projects
Assessing Seismic Risk in Higher Education Buildings
- Format:
- HTML
February 18, 1998 - Assessing Seismic Risk in Higher Education Buildings
Funding Higher Education Capital Outlay
- Format:
- HTML
February 19, 1997 - Funding Higher Education Capital Outlay
Financing Future Capital Outlay Costs
- Format:
- HTML
February 19, 1997 - Financing Future Capital Outlay Costs
Accommodating the State’s Inmate Population Growth
- Format:
- HTML
December 28, 1995 - Accommodating the State’s Inmate Population Growth
Uses and Costs of Lease-Payment Bonds
- Format:
- HTML
May 3, 1995 - Uses and Costs of Lease-Payment Bonds
Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill, Capital Outlay Chapter
- Format:
February 22, 1995 - Analysis of the 1995-96 Budget Bill, Capital Outlay Chapter
Accommodating Prison Population Growth
- Format:
- HTML
January 6, 1995 - Accommodating Prison Population Growth
Bonds and the November 1994 Ballots
- Format:
August 9, 1994 - Two bond measures totaling $1.2 billion will be considered by California voters in November. The Legislature soon must decide which, if any, additional general obligation bond measures to place on the November 1994 ballot. The following factors must be considered as the Legislature makes these decisions. (1) Tens of billions of dollars will be needed over the next five years to meet the state’s identified capital outlay needs; (2) Only $1.3 billion of previously authorized general; obligation bonds are available to address these needs; (3) How well the state addresses its capital outlay needs will influence the state’s future competitiveness and economic growth, and Californians’ quality of life; (4) the state’s annual debt burden has risen sharply in recent years. These debt costs are a direct trade-off to using General Fund monies for support of other state programs.